Source is Google Maps. Unable to find any other source, likely a trap street. Needs to be redacted.

You'll want to use JOSM, create an Overpass query to download all unmarked crosswalks, and add the extra tag. It takes less than five minutes if you've done it before.

The preset for crosswalks got changed recently. I, PerplexingPenguins, and h551w had mapped a lot of them previously.

I can go ahead and fix them in bulk if you'd like. It'd only take a few minutes.

I doubt anyone does, but you might try RapiD. https://mapwith.ai/rapid

A water hazard is a particular feature on a golf course. A river bordering a golf course is a natural feature tagged with river tags. The fact that golfers avoid it doesn't make it a golfing feature.

Please don't get off topic. What I choose to do with my time isn't your business. I am not telling you my personal opinion, I am explaining the community's practices developed through years of editing. "Open"StreetMap doesn't mean "map things whatever way you like".

It's not great that you knew this edit would be an annoyance and proceeded with it anyway. Such attitude is common among mappers using this software, and contributes to why we've tired of it.

It is never okay to upload incorrect data to the database for any length of time, because consumers may grab it at any moment and use it for months. Fix your golfing app. It has been a headache for dozens of editors who've spent hundreds of hours cleaning up after people like you.

There are a LOT of 0s and none seem to be valid from county data/parcel info. I was looking at the map here for ~10 seconds. 10 more seconds and I see at least a dozen more. Maybe do an Overpass query for all and mass delete, I think it is safe to assume they are all wrong.

way/759032488???

Still has not been corrected

What exactly is the TIGER error here? Looks like a place=village to me, and legal classifications are irrelevant.

I'm not sure that it's correct to tag ref=* on numbered streets in Grand Junction. I've never seen that done in any municipality. Do you have any insight?

0 Reece Street? node/7258911567

And yet the building=house tag was not removed.

Names should not be used as descriptions. name=Field 5 should become ref=5 with no name, and "Batting Cage" should have no name.

At no point should incorrect information be added to OSM for any length of time. It is more than possible to test things that either add useful data to the map or use a test server like https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

I don't think it's appropriate to add the unit as a name. Probably should be addr:unit instead

Accidentally clicked "review requested", disregard.

I was under the impression that that had been mapped because it would appear that way once opened. Has the construction finished and this U-turn no longer exists?

Right, this is definitely not political commentary on the status of churches in the United States. Pull the other one.

Is Via Sherry really not capitalized?