Any legit reason not to?

The names are back.

The wiki is vague because there hasn't been a proposal to standardize fire station tagging. With that said, you tagged the building and grounds just how I'd do it.

I didn't mean to upload the nodes with PARCEL and POOLSQFT tags. Oops

Reverting old edits only gets problematic if there are intermediate edits. This generally isn't the case for deleted features, for obvious reasons.

You can undelete features in JOSM using the Undelete plugin. See here: osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Undelete

Lots of strange address tags on node/9517862462

addr:state=SR in Texas? State Route 429 misinterpreted as state by crawler. node/11415726019

Attempting to revert individual changesets just makes it harder for the DWG. Let them handle it.

This revert didn't completely work: relation/9230315

Check capitalization on "FIfth" Street

Why add the tag at all? It should be assumed on any two-lane road unless tagged oneway=yes

addr:* tags shouldn't be used on streets, only features with an actual address

This doesn't seem very useful.

Someone has reverted your change changeset/152500638

Meridian has over 130,000 people. That alone ought to qualify it as a city.

My comment was meant to be terse, not rude. I think it is better to use that time to add new data to the map.

All of the paths removed in this changeset that I looked at appear to exist, based on aerial and street photos.

A principle of OpenStreetMap is that you can map anything that is verifiable. So someone decided to map this one area in detail. There is nothing wrong with that. It is the role of the data consumer to filter unwanted data.

You should provide some sort of evidence that these paths don't exist, otherwise someone else may map them again, using the aerial photo as a source.

The GIS site uses Google as a basemap. Google also uses TIGER data for names and geometry. This is why it shows up there as well.

No such thing as "overmapping". Ther are valid reasons to map sidewalks along streets or even building walk-ups. Please revert this changeset.

You can get them on occasion from City Council packets, but I get preliminary plats from https://apps.adacounty.id.gov/adafilebrowse/default.aspx?dept=Assessor&name=StreetNameFinal and final plats from the plat book, which is published here: https://adacountyassessor.org/docs/subdivisionplats/

Some of these aren't in stores, despite the branch name. That is the problem.