OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175132977 25 days ago

Hi,

In this situation the crossing tag should have been removed rather than the node itself as it was part of a building way.

I've restored the building geometry in changeset/175133725

174274947 about 1 month ago

Instead of using oneway=-1 you can simply reverse the way. oneway=yes is much more intuitive than oneway=-1

oneway=-1

174100154 about 2 months ago

You've mapped some of these buildings as triangles which is incorrect. Most of these buildings should be rectangular. You should also press "Q" after drawing a building to orthagonalise its shape.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174100154

174056939 about 2 months ago

Thanks for the tip, but it was slightly more complicated than that. I had to disconnect a node (ALT+J) from a few ways and one I couldn't do because I had to undelete a deleted node as well (I found a partial revert easier for that). Normal dragged nodes are easy enough to restore their location without a revert, I agree :)

174046192 about 2 months ago

What is this untagged way meant to be way/1446647689 and is this bus route (relation/16087037) meant to route over it?

173973722 about 2 months ago

Sorry, this was mean to be a comment for this changeset: changeset/174135730

173973722 about 2 months ago

The correct role for the bus stop in the route relation is "platform" rather than "bus_stop", and it should be ordered rather than appended to the bottom of the route

174054614 about 2 months ago

Here, you also added the stops to the route masters (osm.wiki/Relation:route_master). This is incorrect, as the route masters should only have members of the route variants on that line

174056939 about 2 months ago

I've reverted the problematic changes in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=174088754.

Please take care not to accidentally drag and merge nodes

174056939 about 2 months ago

This needs to be reverted. Several dragged nodes, one with no obvious fix (deleted nodes, weird merges).

Reverting this changeset alone generates conflicts I couldn't resolve, so someone else will have to fix this.

174054614 about 2 months ago

As described in the other changeset, the stop positions are currently not ordered properly.

174048112 about 2 months ago

Hi, thanks for adding the stop positions. Just a heads up, the order of the stops, platforms, and ways in the route relations matter. osm.wiki/Relation:route

Currently, both of the routes you added a stop to have the stop as the last member. It should be ordered, from the top, in order of the railway stops and platforms, then the railway ways in order of the route.

So, for instance; Flinders Street => Mernda route, the Keon Park stop should come directly after Ruthven stop and platform.

relation/14024884
relation/14024885

174049347 about 2 months ago

Please don't connect building nodes to the SRL (way/1003899336/history/36)

173956663 about 2 months ago

The driveway and footpath should have a connecting node at the intersection of the ways

173954910 about 2 months ago

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

In this changeset you've added a building that shares nodes with the SRL East way.

way/1446183081/history/1

As the buildings on the surface do not connect to or are attached to an underground construction way in anyway, they should not share nodes with each other.

I've removed the nodes from the SRL in changeset/173955146.

Please take care not to attach buildings nodes to the SRL in future.

Also, if you can contact the smart-cities-transport-project-71 organiser and inform them that some mappers keep adding nodes to the SRL, it would be much appreciated. I am unable to find the contact information of the organiser who's responsible for the mapping through the smartcitiestransport website without making an account.

173655601 about 2 months ago

The highway=* ways should have a connecting node at their intersection.

i.e. the service road and cycleway should be connected with a node at the intersection of both ways

173865854 about 2 months ago

The driveway should connect to the road in addition to the footpath

173869216 about 2 months ago

The driveway should connect to the road in addition to the footpath

173953520 about 2 months ago

Please make sure that you don't forget to connect the driveways to the road rather than just the footpath (unlike what you've done here)

173931412 about 2 months ago

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM.

In this changeset you added some building nodes to the SRL (way/1003899336/history/31). I've since disconnected them in this changeset: changeset/173952611

Please refrain from connecting building nodes to the underground railway construction ways as they are not connected in any way.