… seeing changes made by remote mappers.
I get it, some corporates want(ed) gaps in the map to be populated as rapidly as possible to be exploited in the near future (well, what else?).
I’ve lost track whether field data, collected on the ground (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source=survey), as my hobby, simply for fun (when I began mapping back in 2013) is completely overwritten by paid contractors from thousands of miles away.
Five years time, through the Black Mirror might translate into the measure of an eon. Back then, high resolution imagery were only available for select places. So GPS tracks made mapping possible. Fast forward in time, we get additional imagery layers to make mapping easier - with an invisible warning sign that imageries may not really tell what’s what with respect to the reality.
Now as this particular hobby has got its way shoved by other important life priorities, sometimes finding the right time to map is a challenge - but I may have not given up to volunteer uploading geodata into OpenStreetMap - right from where I traverse with my humble mode of transportation.
I’m not totally frustrated with all these remote mappers. Some areas may have been mapped gorgeously e.g. unmapped highways in housing estates with regular patterns were mapped by these team - I really disliked mapping these, though.
Some may have access to better data e.g. derived GPS tracks from trips made by car-share rides, or possible unmapped highways outputs from a machine vision with the assistance of imagery with better clarity.
Don’t get me wrong, everyone including me, made mistakes (e.g. not responding to feedbacks and so on).
But sometimes, things get too much - I may need to take a break. So, there goes my diary entry: I just wanted to vent out things. Happy mapping, everyone!
Discussion
Comment from kucai on 22 February 2020 at 03:13
Lek lek. Kratom is widely available in the event you need a chill out or two! I might even join in.
Comment from AkuAnakTimur on 22 February 2020 at 15:31
Let’s!
Comment from Mateusz Konieczny on 24 February 2020 at 10:00
“is completely overwritten by paid contractors from thousands of miles away.”
Is it “completely overwritten” as in “improved” or “damaged”?
Comment from AkuAnakTimur on 24 February 2020 at 12:24
I’m biased to say, damaged - unfortunately. The bad side of things apparently eclipsed the chill side of things. At least, some edits were un-did through changeset discussions, or I made the corrections myself. Well, if I managed to have a sneak peak. Some destructive edits were only noticed for several months - that’s what you get when you’re the only active mapper around.
Comment from joost schouppe on 24 February 2020 at 18:16
Hope the venting helped and you can get back to mapping now :)
If you have the feeling the organised (corporate?) editors in your area are not delivering quality, and/or are not respecting the organised editing guidelines, do get some more people involved. Be it from your local community or from OSMF if needed.
Comment from AkuAnakTimur on 26 February 2020 at 11:49
Thanks for the link!
Comment from Mateusz Konieczny on 28 February 2020 at 15:43
osm.wiki/Data_working_group is the next potentially useful link - it is a good idea to report destructive accounts to DWG.
They may block accounts ( osm.org/user_blocks ), warn user and help with revering damaging edits.
And not following organised editing guidelines is one of ways how someone may be destructive.