Go ahead making adjustments for it

way/370289700 (way/370289700) is manually surveyed by me back in 2015 (check history in JOSM by CTRL+H).

It might appear as a paved residential highway, but usually it might not be the case. This highway is next to a canal, and from imagery, this highway serves only a few houses to its western end of this highway.

I might upgrade the highway from its western end, up to node/3739997555 (node/3739997555) as a highway=service.

Beyond that node, I've considered it should be left untouched.

Fair enough. way/288251424 (way/288251424) could be tagged as highway=service

way/557212832 (way/557212832) could be an alley (service=alley) instead.

It's a quite narrow highway passing through some houses which do not belong in a planned housing estate e.g. the one just laying south of these houses.

http://osmz.ru/imagery/#19/6.17116/100.36885/mp

Fair enough, please make appropriate adjustments for only these highways

Consider using access tags to indicate no through traffic.

access=*

Please make amendment for this way: way/706856742

From my daily commute, this stretch of highway is barely navigable by cars. It is close to a track rather than a residential highway.

These (way/160693842, way/287331641 and way/287331661) are collector highways. I've been there very recently (June 2019).

The way (way/333017415) beyond the particular node (node/3401317887) is mapped as unclassified highway because it has higher hierarchy - it carries more traffic in and out across this village.

Source - I'm a local mapper

The way way/329614444 may act as a collector road from node/6639581545 to the adjacent unclassified highway.

From the same node to node/6639581541, the highway might serve as a driveway (highway=service, service=driveway) because it only leads to a house.

I've cycled through this area myself back in February 2015 (refer changeset date).

way/493408183 and way/551373827 may act as collector roads for the adjacent villages.

Please do not change them.

Fair enough, please adjust them accordingly

way/394165932
way/394165965
way/394165931
way/394165955

I will amend the boundary of the residential area (way/318224761) later. There are only a few houses in the area, but obviously the retail buildings next to the major highway dominates the landuse (retail).

The details of the highways of this area may be left untouched as they are.

Unfortunately I may have not uploaded my own collection of GPS tracks to map details like this, but hopefully your team gets what I'm trying to convey the message.

I'm a local, active mapper around this place (Alor Setar town and its surroundings) - so you have my word.

way/603932790
way/603932791

Please check the edit dates too. Bing imagery across the city dates from 2014. Maxar imageries (which can also be found in Esri World Imagery) could be from 2017.

Feel free to downgrade them as residential highways

That particular highway (way/245634672) should follow my earlier argument: this stretch of highway is not in an adjacent residential estate. It may carry more significant traffic than the adjacent residential highways because it acts as a collector highway to the adjacent trunk highway.

Hi, I spotted your edit of Jalan Sekolah (way/248478117).

Your edit has extended this highway to follow what is supposed to be an agricultural track with a rough surface of mixed ground or rough gravels - beyond node/6639464288 (node/6639464288) and northwards up until node/6639464246 (node/6639464246).

On top of that, the rest of the highway on the most northern bits is obviously not "Jalan Sekolah" (name=Jalan Sekolah).

Please make corrections for this issue. Thanks in advance.

Sorry for the delay in responding for your changeset discussions, for I was having other commitments lately. I will try my best to respond to each one. On top of that, I live across this particular area of the world and contributed to OSM for more than 5 years in this same area.