Thank you Sir, for your edit (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8774900126).
Kind regards.

Thank you Sir for your revert and info.
The previous editor also mentions this info came from a survey (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/16161496). We should aware of this.

Kind regards.

Thank you Sir, for your info and revert (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/366747918). Will more careful about objects like this.
Kind regards.

Thank you Sir, for your info & revert. It is always good to refer to the original intent.

Thank you Sir for your revert this (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/239305046). I do agree with you. Also from imagery, it is not like a bridge around a building.

Thank you Sir for your revert (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/667097224).
It is like overlapping with this building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/528002669).

Thank you Sir for your revert (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/504331829) and your information.
Kind regards.

@aharvey. Thank you Sir for your info and revert (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/948142387). It is very clear information from you.

@aharvey Thank you Sir for your revert. Really appreciated it.
Kind regards.

@aharvey. Hi Sir. You are correct.
I checked these links (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source:geometry#wiki) & (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source:position#wiki). It will open the same Wiki page (osm.wiki/Key%3Asource%3Ageometry).
Let me double-check with her later about this changeset.
Kind regards.

@aharvey. Hello Sir.
I do agree with your feedback. Since the original user said it come from survey (https://osmcha.org/changesets/59146433/), it probably goes continue into the shelter.
I modified it back (changeset/105499148).
Kind regards.

Thank you Sir, for your revert on this
(https://osmcha.org/changesets/105493086/)
Kind regards.

@aharvey. Thank you Sir for your revert.
We should stick more to your suggestion "Please don't just blindly "fix" iD warnings..."

Kind regards.

@aharvey Hello Sir. Thank you for your feedback. I have double-checked this (layer=*) and agree with you about layer=0.
Should be reverted here (changeset/105497388)

Kind regards.

Hi Daniel,

Yes, the tiny intersection might have triggered the detection.
Thank you for adjusting it, I really appreciate it.

Kind regards
=)

Hi Daniel,
Hope you don't mind if I'm jumping here.
Not sure if Atlas-checks detecting is as a stand-alone building. Seems it detect duplicate/overlapping ways rather than as building/polygon.

For more info please check this (https://github.com/osmlab/atlas-checks/blob/dev/docs/available_checks.md).

Kind regards

Hi Joseph E.
Hope you are doing great.
What is the type of this relation?

relation/8512380

osm.wiki/Types_of_relation

Kind regards,

Hi Joseph E.
Hope you are doing great.
What is the type of this relation?

relation/8513251

osm.wiki/Types_of_relation

Hi Canal des Pangalanes .
Thank you for your message. It looks came from human editing specially from my colleagues to smoothing the road geometry.
(changeset/61700324)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104105066

Thank you for your response. No problem sometimes happens to me to mistagged the object.
Thank you for fix it.

Happy mapping.