4rch's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 28752763 | almost 11 years ago | Nein, da "Ein- und Ausgang Schloss" nicht der Eigenname des Platzes ist sondern lediglich einen beschreibenden Charakter hat. Der Haupteingang wurde schon hinreichend erfasst mit entrance=main: node/100062814 Gruß |
| 28752763 | almost 11 years ago | bzgl. der Relation "Ein- und Ausgang Schloss" relation/4576979
|
| 28715427 | almost 11 years ago | One more damaged boundary:
|
| 28699165 | almost 11 years ago | Please do not merge highways which are linked with administrative divisions. I've repaired four damaged boundary relations: changeset/28749082 |
| 28719169 | almost 11 years ago | Diskussion siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=484714#p484714 |
| 28632639 | almost 11 years ago | I've tried to repair the boundary. Please check if all is ok know. Here is a hole without an administrative unit, is this ok? osm.org/?mlat=43.2748&mlon=-2.8946#map=15/43.2748/-2.8946 |
| 28632639 | almost 11 years ago | This edit damaged the following administrative boundary: relation/347287 |
| 28715427 | almost 11 years ago | It seems that you've damaged many administrative boundaries. I've already repaired two damaged boundaries, but there are many more damaged boundaries, for example:
|
| 28653270 | almost 11 years ago | Viel Spaß, aber trag bitte so etwas nicht in OpenStreetMap ein sondern nutze Services wie z.B. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/ |
| 27639527 | almost 11 years ago | Sorry for my tone, I've fixed about 30 other damaged boundaries before and was a bit annoyed.
[1] http://www.lccountymt.gov/it/gis-maps/helena-county-atlas.html |
| 27639527 | almost 11 years ago | Why is the boundary of Helena obsolete? Please state out sources. Wikipedia states out that the boundary of Helena is correct: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_%28Montana%29 (Google shows also the boundary which you've deleted) When you delete boundaries please delete them completely and not only partly. It is a mess, you've deleted only 50% of the boundaries and left the rest in the database. |
| 28468755 | almost 11 years ago | Danke, dann hake ich das mal auf der Liste mit kürzlich gelöschten administrativen Einheiten [1] ab ;) [1] http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=92 |
| 28468755 | almost 11 years ago | Warum hast du die Relation von Schönberg gelöscht? relation/4139252
|
| 28447373 | almost 11 years ago | please do not merge this river. The river is split because it is part of some administrative boundaries which got damaged now. |
| 28409217 | almost 11 years ago | this changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. |
| 28226353 | almost 11 years ago | Was mir noch aufgefallen ist - Grate wie hier [1] sind keine Klippen sondern natural=ridge respektive natural=arete [1] way/279868700 |
| 28226353 | almost 11 years ago | Hallo, es ist schön und äußerst lobenswert, dass du die Gletscherspalten erfasst hast, aber diese als "inner" aus dem Gletscher "auszustanzen" ist verkehrt. Die Spalten sind Teil des Gletschers, der Gletscher fließt auch unter den Spalten. Wenn du Gletscherspalten auf der Karte angezeigt haben willst, dann schlage dies bitte unter https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues vor und mache bitte kein Tagging for the renderer: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer Gruß Arch |
| 27724079 | almost 11 years ago | Hi, I've noticed that you've deleted the boundary ways of the Hibiscus Coast. Is this boundary obsolete? If yes, than the following relation and way should be deleted: relation/2104478 |
| 27722177 | almost 11 years ago | This changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. Please do not delete river ways. River ways are necessary for rendering + routing + boundaries. I've repaired the damaged boundaries already. |
| 20612095 | almost 11 years ago | Diskussion bezüglich dieses Changesets unter: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=478952#p478952 |