4rch's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 27514904 | over 10 years ago | Stop your rude tone. Otherwhise I can see no reasons why I should talk with you. |
| 27514904 | over 10 years ago | |
| 28969893 | over 10 years ago | This is the High Altitude Military Training Camp of the nepalese army: http://therisingnepal.org.np/news/5 |
| 30266060 | over 10 years ago | @mitzip: we have the same boundaries as Google/Bing/HERE Map: http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/#13/45.7653/18.8930&num=4&mt0=mapnik&mt1=google-map&mt2=bing-map&mt3=nokia-map |
| 30266060 | over 10 years ago | @mitzip: I've restored the border line before Liberland was added. Please take into account that borders may be approximate in areas without clearly defined borders: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf |
| 30266060 | over 10 years ago | Liberland has no physical control in the mentioned area. It is not recognized by any other state. Please read the following document (paragraph "borders and boundaries") from the OSM Foundation: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf |
| 30266060 | over 10 years ago | Hello Golovco Anatolie, I had to remove Liberland. If you want to map fictional states please use http://opengeofiction.net/ Best regards, Arch |
| 30491860 | over 10 years ago | Hello, please do not add overlapping ways. |
| 30502015 | over 10 years ago | Hello, tracktype grade1 means asphalt.The following way clearly hasn't an asphalt surface: way/340629331 Also it isn't a track, it's to small therefore. Regards, Arch |
| 30512331 | over 10 years ago | Hello Peter, Bing imagery is heavily distorted in this area. Please do not align the paths with Bing imagery. |
| 30495791 | over 10 years ago | Hello harsham, when you select a building and press "s" in the iD-Editor you can make buildings rectangular. Regards, Arch |
| 30494968 | over 10 years ago | Hello Hélène Draux, this is not an highway. In fact it is a stream. Regards, Arch |
| 30465423 | over 10 years ago | Hello ViriatoLusitano_import, it seems that your edit damaged about 20 administrative divisions in Portugal. You can find the list with all damaged boundaries here: http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index.php/projekte/internationale-administrative-grenzen/missing-boundaries/10-osm-reports/170-countries-compare-2015-04-26 |
| 30426689 | over 10 years ago | Hello Israelmeirwi, I've rolled back your changes. The boundary is disputed and as far as I can see you haven't started a discussion with the local OSM community about your changes. |
| 29622811 | over 10 years ago | Hello, it seems that you have adjusted the imagery wrong. The boundaries have an offset of about 200 meters east. Example: relation/4709948 |
| 30048700 | over 10 years ago | I've tried to fix it: relation/112928 |
| 30048700 | over 10 years ago | Hi, it seems that you've damaged the boundary of Thornton due to your edits. please use an appropriate editor like JOSM for boundary edits. iD has no built in validator so you won't get error messages when you damage boundary relations. |
| 29982158 | over 10 years ago | Hello Stereo,
|
| 29873706 | over 10 years ago | Hello, you've damaged the following administrative boundaries due to your edits:
Best regards, 4rch |
| 29827738 | over 10 years ago | Hello Cyrille37, please load all existing boundary relations into JOSM before you split boundary ways. otherwhise you'll damage existing boundary relations. Due to your edits several administrative boundaries in Algeria got damaged: http://osm.wno-edv-service.de:82/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=143
Best regards, 4rch |