zidel's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168265560 | 6 months ago | Reverted in 168266012, I accidentally applied an offset to the building |
| 146641902 | 9 months ago | Huh, that is some strange tagging by EveryDoor, thanks for highlighting it. I've retagged it as amenity=bureau_de_change in changeset/164345205 since that is what the others in Europe are tagged as. Doesn't feel quite right, but shop=gold_buyer/pawnbroker seem slightly worse. |
| 149559591 | over 1 year ago | Reverterte endringen på en del av en vei på østlandet som jeg antar var et uhell i changeset/149880694. |
| 142274228 | about 2 years ago | Hei, tok en titt siden du ba om review og det ser veldig bra ut. Den eneste kommentaren jeg har er på den lille biten med sykkelvei ved Huldreberget [0]. Vanligvis så pleier vi å tegne sykkelvei med fortau med en linje + sidewalk=* tag i stedet for to separate linjer. Hvis du vil tegne fortauet separat burde du bruke sidewalk=separate på sykkelveien eller ta bort sidewalk taggen. Endret til separate i changeset/142368302. [0] way/253999724 |
| 142191052 | about 2 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing to the map! I took a look at your changes since you requested a review. When you merged the two sections of road, the tags that used to only apply to the section with a merging lane now applies to the whole junction. For name= this seems reasonable, but turn:lanes= needs a different value for each of the sections of road. I've changed turn:lanes back to the way it was so it applies to the correct part of the road, but I left the name alone since I don't know where that should start and stop. Feel free to comment here or send me a message if you have questions or if you think there was something I shouldn't have changed back. |
| 137040152 | over 2 years ago | way/1180139497 was one way in the wrong direction. Fixed in changeset/140124089 |
| 135534220 | over 2 years ago | Yes. Sorry if I accidentally reverted based on memory instead of checking, I don't recall when they took down the signs. There is some discussion around this on note/3765780 as well, last time I checked they hadn't put up a new name yet. |
| 138594116 | over 2 years ago | This should have been source=Kartverket |
| 130171942 | about 3 years ago | Welcome to OSM. It looks like you've added some useful information, but it should probably have been added to the existing point instead of to the address so we don't end up with two versions of the same shop. |
| 129006420 | about 3 years ago | Uploaded a bit too much here. The building edits were done to make it match what the building looks like on the ground. The parts that were removed are only there from floor two and up. |