OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
45567284 almost 9 years ago

Hi.
Thanks for contribute in OSM. I have an ask. ¿The tag oneway=yes in this road (way/469499368) is correct? Please ¿Can you review your changeset? and please conclude the finish of this road.
Greetings.

45632182 almost 9 years ago

Hi SwitchPT
Thanks for contribute in OSM. I have an ask. ¿The tag oneway=yes in this road (way/470030930#map=19/38.75211/-9.23355) is correct? Please ¿Can you review your changeset? and please conclude the finish of this road.
Greetings.

45457374 almost 9 years ago

¿Did you have deleted the objects with local knowledge? If so, your edition is good.

45457374 almost 9 years ago

Hi 1norseman1.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted some objects. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map or maybe you deleted them by mistake, in this case, you can revert your changeset.

45412805 almost 9 years ago

Any person can add objects if they have local knowledge. But the OSM community check if these objects really exist for avoid vandalism in the map.

45434653 almost 9 years ago

Hi saintam1.
You have reason, I've repaired the road, taking into account your comment. Thanks very much. I've learn more about impossible one-way in these days. I'll more careful in my editions.
Greetings.

45412805 almost 9 years ago

Hi.
I see that you was upload this changeset with the information of BIng imagery
The changeset that you was upload has as "Imagery=Bing aerial imagery", but you was guided with Google and Here maps. In Openstreetmap can't use imagery private, only should add objects with free imagery or knowledge local. I recommend change the data source in your changeset. Please note my recomendation, that way you going to avoid notifications to future.
Greetings.

45412805 almost 9 years ago

Hi Crazydoge,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted and added some objects, but this objects added not coincide with Bing satellite imagery. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map and also share the source which can be referred to. Also a parking can't be inside of a building.

45282023 almost 9 years ago

Great, but I propose highway=abandoned, because highway=disused not exist in the wiki OSM.
Regards.

45273782 almost 9 years ago

Hi Oba510,
Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I hadn't realised about restricted access to the roads. I have added the appropriate access tags. Apologies for this slight on my part and thanks again.

45282023 almost 9 years ago

Hi compdude,
Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice and also reverting the changes.

44813569 almost 9 years ago

Hi debutterfly,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've added and deleted some objects that aren't coincide on satellite imagery. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind these features from the map and also share the source which can be referred to.

42287202 almost 9 years ago

Hi Sheidaii,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added several objects in this area that aren't visible on Bing satellite imagery, maybe you added them objects based on any special source? It would be great if you share the source which can be referred to.

44601991 almost 9 years ago

Hi Amigo, hi Iteran
I'm sorry, I made a mistake. Iteran, I think that not is necessary offend, all we commit errors. I'll more careful in my edits, anyway thanks for had corrected my change.

44565483 almost 9 years ago

Hi Andrew_StokesRees
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've added two objects in the same changeset, but the objects are far way from one another in the map. the recommendable is upload changesets that they aren't separated in an area very large. Also this object (way/460935346) hasn't tags, maybe you forgot, I think that you should add tags to this road. And the road should is connect to other road and not to a bridge.

44471152 about 9 years ago

I use OSMCHA (https://github.com/willemarcel/osmcha) for this type of detections. If you add the tags, it will wonderful. Also I recommend insert the correct source :)

44410959 about 9 years ago

Thank you for the reply and such a clear explanation of the current scenario. It does appear that the road has been diverted from the reservoir. I've revert my changeset. Thank you for bringing this to our notice.

44471152 about 9 years ago

Hi OpenBrian
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you splitted one building into 16 stores, but this isn't visible on satellite imagery. I think that you should revert your change to alone one building.

44410959 about 9 years ago

Hi AkuAnakTimur.
Thanks for letting me know about this. I edited this highway based on Bing, where the part of this highway is clearly seen. In Mapwarper, when verified, I couldn't see the block very well. It would be great if you could let me know the recency of the imagery you have used. It would help me in understanding this better and rectifying the changeset if need be.
Thank you.

38042720 about 9 years ago

Hi SD Mapman,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you deleted a road that are visible on satellite imagery, maybe you deleted them by mistake ¿Can you revert your change?