Hi Imp_GL
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you added some roads that are visible on satellite imagery, maybe you deleted them by mistake or are you updating those buildings based on any special source?

Hi Speedy73
I noticed that you have added some objects that aren't visible with Bing image, for that reason I've deleted your changeset. You should more careful with your editions.

Hi ElliottPlack,
I did these changes according to the Tiger Roads 2016 source. According to Bing imagery, this road doesn't exist anymore. Hence, I did not inspect the history of edits to see how recent it was. Thank you for bringing this to my notice, Iǘe already reverted my edit and I will be more careful in editing.

Hi UV289.
Thanks for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've added relations of type route in different roads in this area, generating overlapping and confusion when somebody want correct or add data. Please ¿Can you see and correct it? Several relations can be in same road. This routes should be add with knowledge local.

Hi, I will revert this edit since it's not properly. Please, you should have more careful in your edtions.

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM. The highway=footway isn't visible with Bing imagery satellite. I've deleted this.
Greetings.

Hi juuun juuun.
Thank you for contributing to OSM.
¿The tag oneway=yes in this road is correct?

Hi PeZa.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. ¿The tag oneway=yes in this road (way/353003690) is correct? I noticed of similar cases in more roads.

Hi Paul Johnson.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've added turn lanes that aren't visible on Bing satellite imagery (way/307091446). ¿Are you updating those turn lanes based on any special source?

Hi 25or6to4.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted several roads that were import. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map. I think that you had would aligned these roads instead of deleted. Check also this other changeset (changeset/39009370).

Hi.
If the cars have go back in reverse, then the tag oneway= yes in this road is good.

Hi.
Thanks for contribute in OSM. I have an ask. ¿The tag oneway=yes in this road (way/469499368) is correct? Please ¿Can you review your changeset? and please conclude the finish of this road.
Greetings.

Hi SwitchPT
Thanks for contribute in OSM. I have an ask. ¿The tag oneway=yes in this road (way/470030930#map=19/38.75211/-9.23355) is correct? Please ¿Can you review your changeset? and please conclude the finish of this road.
Greetings.

¿Did you have deleted the objects with local knowledge? If so, your edition is good.

Hi 1norseman1.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted some objects. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map or maybe you deleted them by mistake, in this case, you can revert your changeset.

Any person can add objects if they have local knowledge. But the OSM community check if these objects really exist for avoid vandalism in the map.

Hi saintam1.
You have reason, I've repaired the road, taking into account your comment. Thanks very much. I've learn more about impossible one-way in these days. I'll more careful in my editions.
Greetings.

Hi.
I see that you was upload this changeset with the information of BIng imagery
The changeset that you was upload has as "Imagery=Bing aerial imagery", but you was guided with Google and Here maps. In Openstreetmap can't use imagery private, only should add objects with free imagery or knowledge local. I recommend change the data source in your changeset. Please note my recomendation, that way you going to avoid notifications to future.
Greetings.

Hi Crazydoge,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted and added some objects, but this objects added not coincide with Bing satellite imagery. It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map and also share the source which can be referred to. Also a parking can't be inside of a building.

Great, but I propose highway=abandoned, because highway=disused not exist in the wiki OSM.
Regards.