OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
123573023 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123573017 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123573008 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123573004 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123572993 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123572987 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123572980 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123572976 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

123572972 9 months ago

This changeset was reverted because it was created by unstable Mundi app and has meaningless and wrong changes. See community discussion: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mundi-app-changesets-revert/114478

changeset/164184507

163752695 9 months ago

and again, regarding highway=path, please see mapped things around as examples. if something feels wrong - you can contact person who originally mapped them and ask.
in most cases these are highway=footway + bicycle=yes

163752695 9 months ago

when you map steps, I think it's more correct to mark them with include=up/down and only the steps end should have a different layer than 0.
in general layer is useful when there are crossing items on different heights (e.g. bridge and road under).

164141089 9 months ago

then there is a different way of marking this which depends on actual signs on the road.
if there is no sign explicitly saying foot and bicycle and also no forbidding sign like "foot only" or "no bicycle" - then it usually mapped as highway=footway (aka, primary usage) + with bicycle=yes

if this way is explicitly designed for both foot and bicycle usage and has appropriate sign, only then we usually map it:
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes/no
but even in this case if ways are separated - it's nicer to map them separately and have 1 footway and 1 cycleway.

in general, having only highway=path without extra clarifications is a bad idea is can be used only if actual status is unknown

you can read more here:
highway=cycleway
highway=footway

In any case, if you need a help, you are welcome to join our local community telegram group in telegram: https://t.me/OSM_Israel

164141089 9 months ago

Hi, you downgraded here several footways to a less specific path. May I ask why?

164135041 9 months ago

Hello and welcome to osm!
Unfortunately we can't use any external source of data for the mapping. There is a very limited list of approved sources (like Bing aerial maps). If you didn't got an official approval from municipality - this is a clear copyright violation.
In most cases the only acceptable source is to physically collect such data on the ground.

163910393 9 months ago

Hello and welcome!
Small recommendation if you don't mind: will appreciate if you can try to modify existing objects instead of deleting old and creating new ones (where possible, of course). This ensures that object editing history is preserved and all edits are easier tracked.

163914910 9 months ago

hi, when you mark address as "10-12" - this means 10,11,12, which is a very rare case since 11 is probably on the other side of the road. If building has more than one housenumbers - separate them with a comma ("10,12").

156995143 9 months ago

Hello, this is a clear vandalism and it was reverted.

163645605 9 months ago

Great, just wanted to confirm. Happy mapping!
You also welcome to join our telegram group to discuss any issue you have https://t.me/OSM_Israel

163783400 9 months ago

Hello and welcome!
What kind of apartment you wanted to add here? Private home or airbnb kind?

163645605 9 months ago

Hello and welcome to OSM!
You deleted here quite a lot intermittent streams. May I ask you why?