OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
120480525 over 3 years ago

vandalism: reverted

120481707 over 3 years ago

vandalism: reverted

119916543 over 3 years ago

Hi, your change looks ok. I'd recommend to restore landuse=residential, don't see a good reason to remove it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119916543

120243011 over 3 years ago

Hi, you removed some public transport tags and moved away this bus stop:
node/1803000075/history
Feels like a mistake. Are you sure about this change?

107763008 almost 4 years ago

I assumed they do have because on the official page even on maps where only single route is shown - they still keep the color. But sure, feel free to remove, we'll wait until color marks will appear on the ground.

107763008 almost 4 years ago

Right, the source is from project site

110893491 almost 4 years ago

Hi, this is kind of useless change as areas which are not highways are not used for navigation, so bicycle=no will not affect anything. If you want to let mappes/users know some details, you can use note/description keys instead

93876299 about 4 years ago

Hi, I believe your addition of service=parking_aisle is not correct. Parking aisles are the only roads inside parking. Roads connecting street to parking - are not aisles and should be only highway=service.
see service=parking_aisle

will appreciate if you can change them back

94910928 about 4 years ago

Hi, looks like you broke relation #10616245. Please try to fix it from your local knowledge

111333241 about 4 years ago

IHM not yet supports this tag (see https://github.com/IsraelHikingMap/VectorMap/issues/61)
All other maps - does support this well established tag (cycleway=*)
In Ramat Hasharon most cycle ways mapped this way:
for example: way/37559094#map=18/32.13113/34.84651&layers=C

This specific way is adjusted to the road side, so no GPX record is really required to map it.

111333241 about 4 years ago

just switch to Cycle Map - you'll see one rendered on the west road side and one separate. I personally prefer the one on the road because of less maintenance cost.

111333241 over 4 years ago

Hi, you added duplicate cicleway on HaNetzah street. I already defined it lont time ago as a cycleway:left=track on the road itself.

111165723 over 4 years ago

Interesting idea! Will definitely do!
I still want to keep the "master" relation to easier find all child relations, mostly for management.

111107995 over 4 years ago

hello and welcome!
small correction: name tag should always have text in area local language. Other languages should be added as name:en, name:he,.. tags.
I fixed tags on Bet Gavriel: way/914243780
Also, it's better to not spread edits over long distances, you can commit changes any time you want, don't forget to write meaningful explanation of the change to help other mappers to understand your change.

110037362 over 4 years ago

Hi, may I ask why you removed wikipedia tag and added same wiki link as a website?

91837487 over 4 years ago

Hi, osm has a rule about roundabouts naming: they should be named only if have dedicated name sign, and should not inherit connected roads names.
See junction=roundabout

104764615 over 4 years ago

Hi, here you renamed very small part of Bat Galim Promenade to Arie Gurel. Can you comfirm that only this (way/35010792) small part was renamed or whole promenade had its name changed?

Also, please use more meaningfull comments for changesets and add sources, this will help other mappers.

92030463 over 4 years ago

Hi and welcome, small note: when you add name tag please put local name used by most civilians in the area in the "name" tag, and other languages in the name:he, name:en, etc. If you can't fill the local name, just add only relevant name:* tag and other mappers will complete.

110409705 over 4 years ago

I never saw a rule in OSM which disallows tertiary road to have a dead end.
In any case, there is no a dead end but a proper u-turn.
Additionally, other maps like https://www.govmap.gov.il/?c=185800,659691.48&z=6 do define this appendix with same class as whole street (you can tell this by the fact it's still rendered on a high zoom)

98035298 over 4 years ago

With all due respect, I was here recently and uploaded Mapillary images - this specific crossing is long time not exists (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=822730465079077).
Please recheck your sources and avoid using old Bing imagery without local knowledge.
There are plenty fresh images on Mapillary and Kartaview.