welcome to osm and thank you for contribution!

you deleted here natural=spring and description tags. what was incorrect with them?

BTW, if using aerial imagery don't forget to align them to existing GPX tracks. looks like your new roundabout and freshly moved "Alfasi" roads south to it should be shifted to the right

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contribution!

Asked for review? Here you go:

way/1393055764:
junction=circular are very rare in our area (round but without right of the way), sure this is the case? if it's a regular roundabout, then junction=roundabout is more correct. Also, they usually have a name tag only if there is an official name for this specific junction, if none - leave empty, don't use connected street names.

rest - all good!
happy mapping!

same question for way/1370082427 area with node/12688373900 node

hi, you deleted here this area way/1370082426/history/1, maybe it's not really an abandoned village, but on satellite images it looks like at least ruins. maybe we should preserve it with different tags?

hi, does it make sense to have a constant maxheight for a big road chunk?
(I usually only define maxheight on a small chunk under the bridge to not affect other, probably passable, areas.)

Hi, can you, please, avoid using non-standard tags like hashtags? The "source:addr" would be more appropriate here

hi and welcome!
if this (way/1304238973) roundabout has official name, it's better to add name tag on the highway itself instead of the grass area.
also, if grass takes all the inner space - you can reuse existing highway nodes and create a new way for grass. ping me if you need help with fixing this

Hi and welcome!
did you wanted to convert road under construction to the active road?
if yes, you should merge these two tags:
highway=construction
construction=tertiary

to be:
highway=tertiary

and can remove check_date tag (or update it to today's date)

Hi and welcome to OSM!
Important note - we are not allowed to use municipal gis data for OSM mapping. Without proper approval this is a serious copyright violation. You can only use approved sources (usually available in the editors) like bing and esri). If you continue to use unapproved sources - all your work might be reverted and your user will be blocked.

Hi, you added here roundabout (way/1387430145) which I can't find on any available satellite imagery. Can you, please, confirm your sources and that this was not mistake?

hi, also the 24/6 is not standard format for hours (in node/12816126410) I'm afraid you'll need to do something like "Mo-Su: 00:00-24:00; Sa: off"

Hi, you also added strange round building way/1384151277 I'd like to know what kind of building is this? I don't see anything similar on street view maps.

I understand, but Tashoot is definitely originated from Hebrew...
Never mind, if they like it this way - let it be.
thanks!

I'd also add amenity=boat_rental, guess this will not conflict with the club tag

heeey, should not the name tag be in Hebrew? ;)
Herzliya Pituach is a special case, but still it's in Israel :)

Hi, you changed street name
הר הארבל
to
ארבל

can you, please, confirm which one is correct and what is your source? This change happens second time, so I'd like some proofs from the ground if you have

I personally don't see any use for these "note=street location" notes. Do you? Let's not add them?

Hi Omer, if there is an only single building nearby, I'd add address to the building instead of creation of an address node

Hi, I just corrected an old mistake, removed name tag from roundabouts junctions. By a convention name tag should be used only in case roundabout has a dedicated name.

See more here:
junction=roundabout#The_roundabout_itself