Hi Phil,

Thanks for revewing the edit. The editor might have set the access as YES by seeing the motorvehicles from the aerial view and we do have feedback from delivery that the road is accessible. But adding private/designated makes more sense as the remaining tags were added as designated.

We trust local mappers over remote sources.Thanks again for the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Phil,

Thanks for the information. That was really helpful. Please let us know if there is anything that can improve the edits.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. We apologies for the mistake here. We will connect with the editor and have a word to add comments clearly from next time.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The editor might have turned off the building feature. That is why it got missed. Thanks again for reviewing it. We are updating the edits as per your suggestion.

Please let us know if we need to add anything else so that it can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. In the same wiki it states that "A driveway onto a residential or commercial property, even if there are a small number of parking spots, should still be tagged highway=service and service=driveway, and not as parking_aisle" in (Disambiguation) so it shouldn't be a parking aisle, either it should be a driveway or service road. As it is leading to multiple entities here.So its better to tag it as service road.

Please let us know if there is any correction. We are happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edits. The editor might have thought that service road being connected to path from both ends making it of no use. Changing the service road to path could have been a better edit rather than deleting it. We are reverting this edit. ''

Please let us know if we can add anything else to this edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The edit was made based on the latest imagery available and as per our internal image sources (latest). We will update the editors to specify the image source going forward.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. We always use the latest imagery available in OSM to add road segments. And we do have an internal image source of Digital globe. Editor might have missed to mention the source. we will look into it and update the editors to add image source as well.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Editor might have thought that it is also a residential road as most of the neighborhood is classified as residential. But yes it is leading to the garages which are in the back yard of the residential entities (might be an alley). There is another road to access the entities. Thanks for reviewing and changing it back

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi DaveF,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Yes, the road looks like it is leading to single entities from different ways.There is no proof to confirm that it is a loop. Thanks for the review again. We are changing it back accordingly as per your suggestion.

Please let us know if there is anything else to add that can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. The Un-maintained track road was drawn 2 years ago. There is no enough resource to check whether it is really a track road or not. The pavement around Dyer Engineering looks paved and it is an industrial building. So the editor drew service roads from Un-Maintained track and just added Motor vehicle access=yes as the vehicles can bee seen from the aerial imagery.

Please let us know if there is any better edit so that we can change it accordingly.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi,

The building passages were added as per the ground truth. We followed the same as most of the mappers in UK are following. And yes it is mentioned in wiki that the way and building should share the nodes at entry/exit. We will edit it as per your suggestion and continue the same for the future edits.

Please let us know if there is anything else that can improve the quality of edits. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Is that about the gate in the street side or about the road that was created extending from Cornwallis Grove ?

Please let us know.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Phil,

Thanks for commenting. We were not using OS open data for the road classification so far. If possible please give suggestions
1.If OS Open data has black lines does it mean that it should always be residential road?
2. If there are no black lines can we go with service/driveway instead of leaving it without mapping?

Please let us know if there is anything that can be considered for these kind of edits.

Regards,
yaswap

Hi Phil,

Thanks for responding back. That really helps. We will change the part of the road to driveway as you mentioned and add private access.

Please let us know if there is anything else that can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,

Thanks for the edit. The editor might have drew the residential road as it looks like the road is leading to residential enties. But there is another way to access those houses. The road that was demoted to service is leading to the backyard of the houses(garages and trash can be seen) looks like an alley. So adding service looks fine. We will upodate the same to our editors.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi ndm,

The edit here was made as per the OSM wiki of highway = service. In case of confusion whether it is a residential or commercial we add service which is the main tag. Later OSM community users may change it to drive way as per their local knowledge.

Please suggest if there is anything that can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Phill,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Our editor drew the road segment and added residential tag as per the OSM wiki of highway=residential and as per "driveway" OSM wiki this was mentioned in it "It is rare for a driveway to be the way to access another roadway." May be it is different from region to region.

Please suggest if there is anything that gives clarity for the road classification in these kind of scenarios.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Bernard,

Thanks for looking into our edits. The node was added as per ESRI clarity beta. But as per the latest aerial imagery sources it looks like the barrier no more exists at this point. We are removing the barrier which was added by our editor.

Please let us know if there is anything that can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.

Hi Constable,

Thanks for looking into our edits. The edit was not completely done by our editor. The gate was added years ago by another user as lift_gate. In the aerial view it looks like it is the possible connection for the trail segment too.So It cannot be connected to the parking area that was mentioned in the comment. As per the resources the location of the gate is not available and the trail path was connected to it before our edit.

Please let us know if there is anything that can improve the edit. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards.
yaswap.