Hallo Xxlfussel, bitte unterlasse die Erstellung solcher kleinteiligen Relationen. Grunsdsätzlich ist es gut, die Grenzlinien, die GRÖSSERE Flächen miteinander teilen, mit Hilfe von Relationen nur einmal in der Datenbank zu haben. Das machen wir bei Gemeindegrenzen oder großen Landnutzungsflächen. Aber nicht bei Parkplätzen - da ist es völlig ok, wenn der Parkplatz einen eigenen Way hat, der die Nodes von einigen Nachbarflächen mitbenutzt. Meine persönliche Faustregel ist, dass ich so ab 50 Nodes anfange, über eine Relation nachzudenken. Diese Grenze ist sicher für jeden woanders, aber bestimmt nicht bei 10 Nodes!

I am afraid "looking at Google Maps and then making edits to OSM" is exactly what we call "copying from Google" - it doesn't matter if you do it digitally or in a more analogue fashion. The fact that you are taking copyrighted information from Google and adding that to OSM is what counts. I have reverted your edits.

The node in question was created 2 years ago. I have reset it to the state it was 2 years ago. I have no knowledge about camping in France - if there was any BS on the French map before the illegal import was made, then exactly that same BS is there (again) now.

DUGA, in your profile you explain what you define as "cosmetic changes". Please explain how your deletion of abandoned railways in this changeset fits your own definition of "cosmetic changes".

Dear Mykhailo, please explain why you reverted this changeset. Please also make it a habit to explain the revert reason directly in your changeset comment in the future, rather than just writing "revert".

Hello Jan, in this changeset you have made changes to an underground road without specifying your source of information. In a private message to another contributor you have claimed to use Google Maps as a source. Please never use Google Maps to contribute data to OSM, as everything you base on Google Maps will have to be reverted. Instead, when making edits to features that are not visible on aerial imagery, always specify which (legal) source the edit is based on.

Not only did you uselessly edit tens of thousands of objects - it appears that the "fix" you performed was changing "NAME" into "name", while leaving a dozen similarly useless tags untouched!

Dear Nordpfeil, this mass "correction" of "syntax errors" violated our automated editing guidelines. The next time you stumble over a five-digit number of nodes that are buggy, please do not blindly "fix" them but seek discussion first. In this particular case, it turns out that the nodes stem from a bad import and need to be removed anyway. Your "fixing" only makes the removal harder.

Dear giorgio92, please explain the source of this data or it will have to be removed as an undiscussed import like the others.

Is there a particular reason why you singled out the building Driekastanjelaarsstraat 50 to draw a garden there, but have not done so in any of the neighbouring properties? Is there something special about the garden in No. 50?

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.

Apologies for the huge bbox, this revert also caught some hospitals in Algeria imported by the same mapper; I will review them later.