Hallo Andreas, Du hast das Tempolimit von way/48453714 von "60;50" auf "50" geändert. Ein Mitarbeiter der Allianz-Versicherung hat dem FOSSGIS geschrieben, das Limit sei aber 60. War Deine Änderung eher "geraten", oder hast Du tatsächlich eine 50 beobachtet?

Dear Myazyk, in the future if you don't know a street name, please do not add something that you find funny instead. Just leave the name empty. "Сексуальна вулиця" which you added in another changeset has been removed; are you sure that "Святкова вулиця" (way/364822090) and "Сонячна вулиця" (
way/676659570) are correct? They sound less offensive but would not be typical street names where I live. If these are inventions too, please remove them. In the case of future complaints about fantasy mapping I will have to block your account for longer. It might be a harmless joke for you but not everyone finds it funny.

I have removed a comment I added here, because I belatedly noticed that this discussion was over a year old and reviving it now doesn't help anyone. Sorry.

I think you are exaggerating here. If there is a conflict between users, we have to look for misbehaviour on all sides and ask everyone to be more respectful. This includes that you should not be deleting someone's additions and branding them a vandal without the necessary diligence.

You also removed a whole lot of buildings that seem perfectly valid according to aerial imagery, e.g. way/822914111 (which has since been recreated as way/822988529). Why did you believe that this building constitued "vandalism" that needed to be reverted?

In this changeset you removed the information that way/99573891 is a christian/catholic cemetery. Why?

Dear Rocketdata team, please improve your organised editing description at osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Rocketdata.io by providing links to the community discussion(s) that you have had prior to these activities, and outlining which data you are contributing in which regions and how that data is created. Please also provide a list of team members directly on that wiki page, rather than by link to rocketdata.io. It would also be good if you could limit the geographic extent of your changesets. In addition, your changeset comments are not sufficient, for example in this particular changeset three nodes were deleted and the comment is "yves" which does not explain why they were deleted (neither does any of the pages linked to). Thank you -- Frederik Ramm, OSMF Data Working Group

Why did you delete a motorway bypass in this changeset? Edits of such magnitude certainly deserve a better explanation (changesert comment) than just "00", e.g. "motorway bypass has been demolished", perhaps with a link to an article in the press to corroborate. Can you supply this information?

Can we perhaps reach out to the county GIS department or so to have this cleared up? Property owner is adamant that any way from the street into the park would cross their private land - should be a question that can easily be settled by asking the right people. Can you help me to identify who "the right people" would be in this case?

Hi, the DWG has received a complaint saying that way/458181471 was on private ground, and tons of park visitors were parking there in Brookview Rd to access the park which annoys residents. Do you have information to the contrary, or is it possible/likely that they are right? -- Cheers, Frederik (DWG Ticket #2020062910000174)

Mein Kommentar richtete sich ja an Aposke, der kann ja Englisch. Ich hab ihm nur gesagt, dass er es nicht so raushängen lassen soll.

Apaske, please stop being condescending. Speaking several languages is a privilege, don't run around flouting that as if you were a better human being because of it. "Der Wilderer" has certainly overstepped the bounds of politeness but continuing to throw English at him when he clearly says he doesn't understand it is not good style either. And maybe you're in a white collar job that frequently demands conversation with international business partners, but in case you weren't aware, there's quite a few people whose jobs do not require proficiency in English.

If you could point out the bridges that have accidentally been removed, I'm sure we can deal with the problem constructively.

(An "Parzelle13"): In dieser Situation war es aber so, dass "Der Wilderer" auf Englisch etwas gefragt wurde. Und das ist keineswegs eine "Unverschämtheit", ich frage auch oft Leute etwas auf Englisch, ohne sicher zu wissen, dass sie Englisch können. Selbst wenn man es als "Unverschämtheit" wahrnähme, wäre eine geeignete Reaktion ein einfaches "I am sorry I do not speak English" oder von mir aus ein "Ich spreche leider nur Deutsch" - und zwar ohne den Zusatz, dass man hier in Deutschland mit Deutschen Bürgern gefälligst die Deutsche Sprache und das Deutsche Brauchtum pflegen möge, und das alles noch in Großbuchstaben. Das muss einem als anderem Deutschen ja nachgerade peinlich sein.

Hallo "Der Wilderer", Dein Umgangston hier ist unter aller Sau. Im allgemeinen gilt in OSM, dass in der ortsüblichen Sprache oder in Englisch geschrieben werden darf. Ich sehe hier zwar konkret keinen Grund, Englisch zu nutzen (Aposke spricht Deutsch, und der Sachverhalt ist eher nicht von internationalem Interesse), aber an Aposkes Stelle hätte ich bei solch rüpelhafter Kritik auch nicht reagiert. Wenn Du Dich noch einmal derart im Ton vergreifst (Großschreibung, "gefälligst", "ist das endlich klar", "Unverschämtheit" usw), dann werde ich Deinen Account sperren.

Vielleicht können wir nun sachlich darüber reden, warum diese Bahngleise und Brücken entfernt wurden.

Danke, Frederik Ramm (OSMF Data Working Group)

PS: In der deutschen Sprache ist übrigens "sprich" der Imperativ von "sprechen".

Dear Marshy8, do you know anything about the access permissions of these trails? Because DWG has received complaints that some of them are on private ground and should be marked access=private. Do you have first-hand knowledge of the area, or is this just tracing from aerial imagery? Where can I find documentation about "#SLOdriveways-project-1"?

Dear John, are you sure that the bicycle=yes classification in Gillfield wood (eg way/807844540) is correct? Asking because DWG had a message from a local saying that this is a footpath only (DWG ticket t#2020062110000045). Is it ok for me to change it?

Hallo ChrisFromRV, trotz mehrfachen Bittens ist hier wieder ein Änderungssatz von Dir ohne Kommentar. Wenn man sich die Mühe macht, nachzusehen, was Du geändert hast, kommt man auf:
1. Metzgerei Walser Swaderer sowie 3 weitere Gebäude von building:demolished auf building_demolished geändert. Das ist falsch oder zumindest sehr unüblich und bedürfte einer Erklärung.
2. way/758368426: highway=cycleway in highway=footway, bicycle=yes geändert. Das ist korrekt, falls vor Ort ein blaues Fußwegschild mit Zusatz "Radfahrer frei" ist. Ist das der Fall? Dann hätte man das im Changeset-Kommentar als Änderungsgrund angeben können.
Gibt es denn wenigstens einen Grund, wieso Du unsere fortgesetzten Bitten um brauchbare Changeset-Kommentare ignorierst? Ich habe in der Vergangenheit, wenn sich Leute über Deine Edits beschwert haben, immer dafür geworben, mit Dir zu reden statt sich über Dich zu beschweren, aber lange kann ich das nicht mehr tun, wenn Du Dich so beratungsresistent verhältst.

Frederik Ramm - für die OSMF Data Working Group

Nachricht an petrich-andy mit Bitte um Kommentar: osm.org/user_blocks/3769

Hi, could you specify a source for your name additions? If you are you adding them because you record the street names locally, add a "source=survey" tag to your changeset, or if you are taking them from other (non copyrighted) material please specify that.

The offensive language in this discussion is not acceptable, and I am not convinced by numide's reasoning. While local knowledge will always be considered paramount in OSM, it doesn't mean that local mappers get to act as if the Arabic alphabet didn't exist. I have blocked user numide here osm.org/user_blocks/3758 until the matter can be resolved but anyone else name-fiddling in the region will meet a similar fate.