Hallo Wolfgang Holtz, bitte vertraue nicht blind dem, was der ID-Editor Dir als angebliche "Datenprobleme" oder "veraltete Tags" auflistet. Ändere diese Dinge nur dann, wenn Du selbst der Ansicht bist, dass die Änderung sinnvoll ist. Das gilt insbesondere auch für das Hinzufügen von Wikipedia/Wikidata-Tags.

Mir ist das auch aufgefallen, und ich habe in changeset/162273867 darum gebeten, das künftig zu unterlassen. Ich werde auch mit einem Skript alle von sundew entfernten Wikidata-Tags ermitteln und ggf. automatisch wiederherstellen (je nachdem, wie viele zusammenkommen).

Hallo sundew, bitte unterlasse unbedingt in Zukunft die Löschung von "operator:wikidata" und ähnlichen Wiki-Tags, ausser dann, wenn sie nachweislich falsch sind. Ich weiss, dass du sie unnötig findest, und Du darfst auch gern darauf verzichten, sie zu erfassen, wenn Du einen neuen Briefkasten o.ä. einträgst, aber wenn Du diese Tags löschst, die jemand anders eingetragen hat, dann übersteigst Du damit Deine Kompetenzen als (wohlgeschätzter) "Lokaler Experte" und wirst zum (unerwünschten) "Lokalfürsten". Ich schreibe Dir diese Nachricht in meiner Rolle als Mitglied der Data Working Group und weise vorsichtshalber darauf hin, dass ein Ignorieren dieser Bitte zum Revertieren von ganzen Changesets führen kann, auch wenn diese anderswo postive Beiträge enthalten.

Dear user Bąbel, please improve your changeset comments. It appears that all your changeset comments are something along the lines of "adding data for 2D/3D", but when I look at your edits they often don't even have anything to do with any 2D/3D stuff - in this changeset for example you removed the tag "residential=urban" from a hotel compound. How is this "uzupełnienie danych pod 2D"? - In general, any changeset comment that can easily apply to more than half of your edits is unlikely to be good. Please read osm.wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian (DWG Ticket#2025020810000229)

Dear Poseidon66, you have deleted too many things in your recent changesets - things that still appear to be there according to aerial imagery. And instead of giving a good reason for your deletions in the "changeset comment" field, all you are telling us is meaningless stuff like "1.2", "1.3". That is not sufficient explanation for such far-reaching deletions, hence I am reverting them now. (DWG Ticket#2025020710000589)

Dear MenKauRa, in this changeset you have added a "Villa Saleh Mammadov (Azeravtoyol ASC)" and a "Villa Alirza Suleymanov (ADY ASC)" as tourism destinations. Can you supply evidence for these locations actually being advertised as tourist apartments or motels? The DWG has a complaint saying that you are abusing OSM to publish personal information about politicians. Please explain. DWG Ticket#2025020710000598

Dear MenKauRa - "roads and objects editing" is not a good changeset comment. Also no need to prefix your comment with "az_07-02-25", as the date is automatically recorded.

Dear farhadGuli, while we value local knowledge in OpenStreetMap, your hostility is not warranted. Every mapper in OpenStreetMap may map in any country they want. If someone makes a mistake mapping in your area, then make it clear to them what the mistake is so that they can do better next time. Don't say things like "go away and map in your country", it reflects badly on you.

relation/18608914 contains both a via point and a via way - is that intentional?

I have now restored those buildings that were deleted and not yet re-drawn: changeset/161898314

Dear user Mastodont, please don't add fictional data to OSM. You can use opengeofiction.net if you want to play; OpenStreetMap is for serious contributions only. Your data has been removed by the community.

Dear easymapper, what is "OSM_Location_Editor" and is it possible that you are doing what we call a "mechanical edit" (editing lots of objects without actually looking at what you're doing)? How is this building in Bangladesh a "site=superfund" and what does that even mean?

In this and many other changesets, you are deleting name:ru tags from streets in Moldova, yet your changeset comment claims that you were "adding" something. Please use changeset comments that match your actual edit, and if deleting name:ru tags (that have been in OSM for 10 years) give a plausible explanation why they are not in use any more.

Dear Esraa Almamoon Mohammed, thank you for your contributions to OSM. Please be careful to only add English names to streets if they are actually signposted in English. We do not want "translations" in the database - we only want actual "secondary names". If the street has signs that show an Arabic and an English name then both can be mapped; but if you are only using your language skills to "translate" the Arabic name into what it "would" be if there "were" a sign, then please don't.

Please do not do that in the future. If you are sure that your imagery is aligned correctly (always remember it could be wrong - compare with GPS traces and adjust if necessary) then it is preferable to modify existing buildings to align with aerial imagery.

If you feel that you absolutely must delete existing buildings and replace them - which is not recommended - then do it in one editing step. Do not delete buildings first and say "I will replace them later". You deleted these buildings 6 weeks ago and you still have not replaced most of them!

Please do not change the name of this waterbody without prior discussion. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/gulf-of-america-gulf-of-mexico/124571

Thank you, I hope I fixed this in changeset/161595102

Dear user thesergo577, the "changeset comment" field is intended for a human-readable description of your changeset, like: "added farmland near XY" or "improved landuse from imagery" or something like that. "6+4" is not a good changeset comment. What is it supposed to mean? See osm.wiki/Uk:%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%85_%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B2_%D0%B7%D0%BC%D1%96%D0%BD

Hallo Derkoenig, bitte erfasse keine historischen Eisenbahnen in OpenStreetMap, wenn vor Ort keine Gleise mehr sichtbar sind. Ich habe stichprobenartig die von Dir neu hinzugefügten railway=razed-Objekte angeschaut und konnte auf dem Luftbild nirgends mehr etwas erkennen, teilweise waren die Strecken sogar überbaut. Solche Informationen kannst Du bei OpenHistoricalMap erfassen, wenn Du Dich dafür interessierst, aber in OSM möchten wir die *heutige* Realität abbilden! Ich habe deswegen Deine railway=razed-Objekte entfernt.

osm.org/user_blocks/17115 asking _BAR_ to stop deleting trails.