Changeset discussions are not a suitable venue for such a detailed discussion, they lack essential formatting and threading. This should be discussed in the community forum thread linked above.

Frederik from OSM's Data Working Group here. Boundaries in OSM should follow actual control, not what some government claims. Among other things, we would ask things like: If you want to travel to this area, do you need a Nepalese visa or an Indian visa? Do the people living in this area pay taxes to the Nepalese authorities or to the Indian authorities? If a crime happens in this region, will it be the Nepalese police investigating, or the Indian police? Questions like this will determine how to map the boundary in OSM - never a government web site. I would ask all involved parties to come to an amicable solution here (potentially involving other community members) https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/india-territory-in-uttarakhand-state/113008 before making further edits. DWG Ticket#2024051010000293

Was war die Datenquelle für diese relativ lagegenaue Einzeichnung unterirdischer Kabelverläufe?

Hallo bahnpirat, in diesem Changeset wurde ein Teil der 380kV-Transversale von einer geraden Linie auf eine Linie mit 15 Nodes verfeinert - kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, welche Datenquelle Du dafür verwendet hast?

Hallo Bahnpirat, kannst Du Dich an die Datenquelle für die hier eingezeichneten unterirdischen Leitungen erinnern?

Der Anwohner hat mir eine Beschreibung des neuen Verlaufs des Wanderwegs geschickt, ich habe den so eingepflegt, wenn Du willst, kannst Du ja mal drüberschauen ob alles korrekt ist.

Hallo Emilio96, ich habe gesehen, dass Du anderweitig mit Mappen beschäftigt bist, kannst Du zu dieser Situation hier etwas sagen oder bist Du nicht mehr in der Region...?

Hello, the tag "Commercial=Toko Kelontong" that you have added to places in this changeset does not make sense.

Siehe Kommentare in changeset/115882204

Nachdem die o.g. Rückfrage weder beantwortet noch bearbeitet wurde, und weil ich überdies diese "Kämme" für nur sehr schwammig definiert halte, habe ich sie heute in changeset/150937463 gelöscht.

Hi, I have asked you specifically to reduce your building uploads, so this is not a general rule, just a rule for you because you were not acting responsibly. And I never said anything about roads an buildings together; it's totally find to upload both in one changeset. When using AI in contributing to OSM it is your responsibility to ensure that the quality is good; you have not done that in the past but blindly trusted AI which is always bad.

Dear itrivi, in this changeset you have added node/11871752648 with a height of 982. The "Cartografía Ráster del IGN" shows this peak with a height of 981, and on the PNOA Spain imagery this peak is not visible at all. So which is your real data source for this peak? Will I find similar discrepancies when I look at the many 100 other peaks you have added recently?

Hello eerib, did you have an on-the-ground source for marking the "permissive" access on way/1205278435/ ? because the land owner complained to DWG claiming this was fully private...

User blocked in osm.org/user_blocks/15997

Dear Monkey D Luffy, most of the buildings you added here have been removed by another user claiming they did not exist. What data source have you used to add these buildings?

Dear user PNWAN6XRLB, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. It is not necessary to hit the "save" button for every building you update; you can do a few in one go ;)

Dear user DotK, please use changeset comments that describe, to another human being, in natural language, what your edit is about. The "#hotosm-project-16660;#wnah;#mapnigeria;#esc2023;#Map4Climate" blurb you're currently putting in there is worthless to other OpenStreetMap community members; something like "traced buildings in Saki" would be 1000 times more valuable than all the hash tags.

done!

Insbesondere scheinen mir hier Wege gelöscht worden zu sein, die "Bergi76" schon vor Jahren versucht hat zu löschen.

Hello D-Man100, in this changeset you have deleted a number of features that clearly exist on the ground, for example way/746559010 (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=150419941&zoom=16&lat=39.37226&lon=-104.91184&layers=B000000TTTFT) - please review and undelete where appropriate.