Addition of "man_made=works" named "PBM" is not sufficiently explained by "source=maxar, bing" (the name is not visible on imagery) - is this from local knowledge, or from another source?

Erstens hat Maxar Premium am 10. Februar, als Du diese Änderung gemacht hast, in JOSM nicht funktioniert und zweitens ist dieses Gebäude auf Maxar Premium nicht zu sehen. Welche anderen Quellen verwendest Du?

Hallo Orgelputzer, stammen die Hausnummern, die Du hier hinzufügst, aus einer anderen Quelle, oder hast Du die selbst in einer Ortsbegehung erfasst?

Dieses Gebäude way/771382668 ist nicht auf dem angegebenen Luftbild "ESRI World Imagery" zu sehen. Welche Quelle wurde hier tatsächlich verwendet?

DWG Ticket#2020013010000082. Please do not make edits that would make the islands either exclusively Greek or exclusively Turkish without first having got agreement from both the Turkish and Greek communities in OpenStreetMap. Boundary edits without such agreement will be treated as vandalism.

Dear Rick Sanchez C-137, you're making a large number of edits to road names, road numbers, and road classifications all over Greece. In order for the community to assess the veracity of these edits, you need to add changeset comments when uploading (see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments) in which you explain what changes you're making and why. If applicable, please also specify the source you are relying on for such edits. Thank you!

I'm trying to take a measured approach here. If something is properly tagged(*) but has a spammy description, I will *normally* delete the spammy description only, except if the object in question is clearly added by a SEO spammer in violation of our mechanical/organised edit rules (e.g. hundreds of dubious "Bitcoin of America" ATMs) and/or clearly part of a scammy industry for which SEO spam is part of their business (Locksmiths being a prime example).

(*) I would normally count something as "properly tagged" if it has a halfway correct leisure/amenity/shop/offfice etc. tag; some businesses egregiously tag themselves amenity=place_of_worship and I will delete them without exception, some don't tag themselves at all (only name, description, opening hours) in which case I'll mostly delete them, and some use the wildcard office=company in which case it's a judgement call.

Happy to restore something to former glory if I should have overstepped.

Hello Warin61, please try and be more friendly when this is a simple beginner's mistake. -- Jason Heritage, it appears you have accidentally uploaded a test data set in an area where there aren't actually any buildings; I have removed them again. Don't let that discourage you - better luck next time ;)

What is the purpose of this newly introduced micro road: way/770089902 ?

"Barrys Discount", meanwhile "Barry Beds & Mattresses", seems severely misplaced (in the middle of a footway). Can you verify?

You changed this way way/141200813/history from amenity=university to building=university which will mean that it will not be recognized as an university by most data processors. Was that intended?

Das wäre auch freundlicher gegangen.

Hello Chellopuddin, can you send a photograph of the alleged signage to [email protected], or alternatively point to any official city or government web site that mentions "Chello Park"? Thank you.

These edits have been reverted by a community member. The current borders are the result of a long decision making process in OSM and cannot be modified unilaterally. Please email [email protected] if you want to register a complaint.

These edits have been reverted by a community member. The current borders are the result of a long decision making process in OSM and cannot be modified unilaterally. Please email [email protected] if you want to register a complaint.

Data Working Group here. You have bother been asked in the past to refrain from fiddling with data contributed by the other. @Adamant1, there is lots of rubbish data all over California that you could fix; could you be persuaded to concentrate your efforts in areas not originally worked by stevea? @stevea, it is an unnecessary slight to brandish someone "sloppy" in a changeset comment. Please don't. To be frank, data like way/281209814 with the tags "OBJECTID", "Zoning", "SHAPE_STAr" and "SHAPE_STLe" should never have been imported that way in the first place; this would never pass muster on today's import guidelines. I would prefer if Adamant1 had not edited this, but editing it and not getting rid of the rubbish tags is doubly bad. But it is what it is! @Both: We have asked you repeatedly to keep the peace and if you don't we will have no choice but give you both a cool-off account block so that you can enjoy the beautiful non-OSM life out there for a while.

The overwhelming majority of OSM contributors are hobbyists or, slightly better-sounding, volunteers - you don't have to say that each time you write a changeset comment ;)

Hello, why have you set the "name:ar" tag of node/6369206439 to "گوڵاڵە" which is clearly not Arabic?

I cannot see a castle on aerial imagery at node/5058776734 - is it possible that this was an accident? I am exasperated at these useless auto-generated changeset comments; if this were a human-written comment we could compare the content of the message to the actual action, but with the message simply being deducted from the action, it loses this value altogether.

Dear Tomiii, in this changeset you added the name "Cigánytelep" to a street in Zámoly. We have received a message from someone in Zámoly saying that the street really does not have a name, and that this is a mistake. Do you know the town and this street name yourself, or do you remember if there was a street sign... or is it possible that this was indeed a mistake? Thank you - Frederik (DWG) (Ticket#2020010210000116)