I am reverting this edit. The map is not "messed up" - someone has mapped driveways and sidewalks which can make the map look busy but it's certainly not unusual. Before you go about deleting things you don't like, please seek a consensus on the relevant forum on community.openstreetmap.org.

Falls diese Gebäude tatsächlich diese "Namen" haben (und es sich nicht um "Beschreibungen" handelt, die im name-Tag nichts zu suchen haben), kann man die auch wiederherstellen, aber bitte nur nach Einzelfallprüfung. Das Mapping "kritischer" Infrastruktur ist uns nicht verboten, sofern diese Infrastruktur vor Ort sichtbar (und z.B. als Gas-Lager o.ä,. erkennbar) ist.

Dear upupagialla11, thank you for your contributions to OSM. You do not have to upload every single building; you can create a few and then upload them all at once. Please do not use a changeset comment of "#manara3h", nobody understands what that means. The changeset comment is intended to inform other members of the OSM community what you did (e.g. "tracing buildings in ....") or so.

Dear upupagialla11, thank you for your contributions to OSM. You do not have to upload every single building; you can create a few and then upload them all at once. Please do not use a changeset comment of "#manara3h", nobody understands what that means. The changeset comment is intended to inform other members of the OSM community what you did (e.g. "tracing buildings in ....") or so.

Dear upupagialla11, thank you for your contributions to OSM. You do not have to upload every single building; you can create a few and then upload them all at once. Please do not use a changeset comment of "#manara3h", nobody understands what that means. The changeset comment is intended to inform other members of the OSM community what you did (e.g. "tracing buildings in ....") or so.

Dear nibbiobruno02, you are adding a lot of very oddly shaped buildings to OSM. Consider using the "q" key to make them rectangular where the aerial imagery suggests they are.

Also, please use a changeset comment that describes your activity to other mappers (e.g. "added buildings in ..."). Don't write "#osmitaly-94", nobody knows what that is.

Hi there, in OSM we do not delete informal trails, instead we mark them approriately. Please see osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F for further information. DWG Ticket#2025032710000549

"meiner Meinung nach" ist keine ausreichende Begründung für einen Massen-Edit. Ich revertiere das jetzt erstmal; wenn die Community das im Forum gutheisst, kann man es ja wiederherstellen.

Dear pmzg, what you are doing here is what we call an "automated" or "mechanical" edit - you're editing with a program that you have written. Our guidelines require that such edits be discussed with the community before they are executed - i.e. you need to tell us what exactly you plan to edit and how, and need to give people a chance to raise concerns. See osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for details. Please could you show me where this discussion has taken place?

In this changeset you have added a lot of non-obvious detail about a railway line. Please make it a habit for future edits to name the source you got the information from in the changeset comment so that we can be sure we're not ingesting information from copyrighted sources.

Hallo, in diesem Changeset hast Du einer Straße den Namen "Lauftreff" gegeben. Kannst Du Dich erinnern, wie es dazu kam? Ein Mitarbeiter der Sylter Verwaltung hat an den FOSSGIS geschrieben, dass es diesen Straßennamen nicht gebe.

Dear Tung130204, in this changeset you have deleted a number of buildings that clearly exist according to aerial imagery, and you have not given a good reason for this. The changeset comment field is a chance for you to explain why you made a certain edit; instead you just wrote "Tùng" which does not explain anything.

It also looks as if you might be adding the names of private individuals to buildings in OpenStreetMap. If this is the case, please stop - and delete the names you have already added. We do not record personal information in OSM.

Ich habe einen Kommentar des Users "rennwagen" versteckt, in dem er seinen Namen, Adresse und Telefonnummer angegeben hat.

Appears this was a deletion of a duplicate way? User "EditWatcher" has since renamed themselves to "(Anonymous)"...

Dear user La Guardia, whenever you add an international name to an object, please specify a source for that international name. (It is not ok to translate or transliterate names and add the results as name:xx; you need to know that the object in question is actually known under that name.)

Hi there Sledder, you have accidentally added an "operator" tag to thousands of nodes (instead of adding it to the ways only). I have removed that tag from the nodes again.

Mapper deleted their own nodes. -- @NothingG, your track did not properly connect with the road in two places which I fixed.

Reverted in changeset/163284326 - mws21313, if you perform a large-scale deletion like that, you need to give reasons that explain why the deletion was warranted.

Dear cicitheexplorer, thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. The text you enter in the "changeset comment" field is seen by other humans and meant to be a concise description of what your edit entails; it could simply be "traced buildings" or something like that. However, writing the completely unintelligible hashtag salad "#hotosm-project-14910 #Accenture #ACNPhilippinesFY25 #acnphl #corpcitph #acnph_40 #onecioph", and thereby treating your fellow mappers as if they were a machine, is considered disrespectful. There as a separate field during upload where you may add hashtags; don't write changeset comments that consist entirely of them.

Dear CoRo67, OpenStreetMap has policies and rules too. Where those of your employer and those of OpenStreetMap contradict, you cannot automatically assume that those of your employer have priority.

When something is a private path/track/trail but clearly exists on the ground, we usually mark this with an "access=private" tag (or sometimes also "access=no" as you have done in some cases). We do not delete something outright that exists on the ground, like for example that part of way/508134677 that extends into the watershed.

Your local knowledge is welcome and we would love to enlist your help in documenting which paths actually do not exist on the ground (as in: when I go there I don't see a path), or which paths may exist but be forbidden to use. However this changeset clearly violates our rules at least in some places and hence I am reverting your changes for the time being.

If you would like to discuss this issue and ultimately find out how changes can be made that reflect your policies without violating ours, the US community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/78 would be a good start!