Dear Juan Manuel, when you make edits like this where the boundary of a national park is changed, please always provide a source in your changeset. Use good changeset comments - not just "Correctiones" which is a catch-all that works for half of all changesets in OSM. For example, for this changeset, you could have written: "Correct national park boundary accourding to <whatever your source was>"

Hey Ercan 55, please use good changeset comments, not "n", "ne", "new", "edit", or "delete". Also you're creating one changeset for every building you add; it is actually better to group them in groups of 20 or even 50, then make ONE upload that says: "tracing buildings in XYZ" or so. (Where XYZ is the name of the place.) If you delete or change something, it is always good to specify a reason: "Deleting POI because the shop has closed", "Deleting building because it has been demolished" or so. (Of course you do not need to use English, you can use any language spoken in the area where you edit too.)

Dear Petey007, please specify a more detailed changeset than "course work", for example: "tracing features of XY golf course from aerial imagery" or so. Please also, for anything that is not visible on aerial imagery, specify the data source you are using, and satisfy yourself that this is actually a data source you are allowed to use and not something that is copyrighted. For example, in this changeset you labeled hole #1 and added par=4; we need to know where that information comes from. Use the "source" field to document your sources in future changeset uploads.

Dear stevethomp, OpenStreetMap expects you to provide a source for information you contribute. In this changeset you have added golf hole details that are not visible from aerial imagery. You're editing across the country so I presume you haven't been at the course in person. So where is the data from? Please provide this information in the source field when you upload; please do this in every changeset from now on unless you're only tracing from imagery. -- If you are taking information from web sites or leaflets, please check the web site's copyright/licensing page before you copy data from there, as any data copied into OSM without permission is liable to be removed again.

Dear mah'x, please consult osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments and choose better changeset comments in the future. Writing just "." is offensive to your fellow mappers who have to waste time finding out what your edit was about :(

osm.org/user_blocks/15681

Please provide a data source for the name "AVL Weather Hall Road". It sounds awfully descriptive for a road.

CurlingMan13, please respond to these comments. Why did you revert, and if your revert was a mistake, have you taken steps to avoid these mistakes in the future?

Hallo VRRIE, bitte verwende künftig deutlichere Changeset-Kommentare. "Infos hinzugefügt" ist ein Kommentar, der zu über Hälfte aller Edits in OSM passt. "Details P&R ergänzt" wäre für Deine letzten Edits viel besser gewesen. Es wäre auch gut, wenn Du angeben würdest, aus welcher Quelle Deine Informatioen stammen - dafür gibt es beim Hochladen ja extra ein Feld. Falls Du im Auftrag des VRR handelst, beachte ausserdem bitte unsere "organised editing guidelines" https://osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines - hier wünschen wir uns unter anderem, dass gewerbliche Akteure, die in OSM mappen, dies transparent tun (z.B. mit einem Hinweis in Deinem Profiltext, wer Du bist und was Deine dienstlichen Aufgaben in bezug auf OSM sind).

osm.org/user_blocks/15668 um den Mapper auf die Sache aufmerksam zu machen

Dear BigKev97, when you revert a changeset please: (1) make an effort to comment on the original changeset that has introduced the error, and explain to the mapper what they did wrong so they can do better next time. (2) In your revert changeset, explain the reason for revert, which may also be a pointer to your comment in (1).

Dear Ayse Sagır, you are doing a lot of mapping regarding railways and roads that are under construction. These are not visible on aerial imagery. What is your data source? Please explain your data source for the railway construction in this changeset, and whenever you add something in the future that is not visible on aerial imagery, please explain directly in the changeset what your sources are so that other mappers can check if your edits are correct.

Hallo Mtngy, bitte halte Dich doch ein bisschen zurück, was die Detailversessenheit beim Flächenmapping betrifft. Mini-"Scrub"-Areas wie way/1246968817 sind kein Mapping, die sind "Malen nach Zahlen". Eine Karte ist immer auch Abstraktion - unser Ziel ist nicht, irgendwann ein Luftbild zu werden ;)

Dear Avni Miftari, what is your source for naming a road inside Kosovo "Islam Lika" when it was "Fazli Grajqevci" before?

Dead CDZIKI, your account is quite new and it would be good if you could describe your edits in greater detail than just "Oprava". Especially if you delete a lot of nodes like you did here! (This is also true for your sister accont CD1850 which is older but tends to use "Oprava" too...)

Hallo Christoph Lotz, die Verwendung von "postal_code" an Straßen ist unüblich und unnötig, denn man kann bereits anhand der PLZ-Polygone feststellen, wie die PLZ zu einer Straße ist! Ausserdem hast Du dieses Changeset versehentlich mit "addr:country corrected" tituliert. Übrigens, auch addr:country ist eigentlich überflüssig; die Arbeit, eventuelle Fehlschreibungen zu korrigieren, würde ich mir an Deiner Stelle sparen.

Hallo lberges, ich finde die Benennung von Bauernhöfen mit den Betreibernamen problematisch. Ich plane, die von Dir eingetragenen Namen zu entfernen. In https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/beratungsresistente-user-und-deren-verbotene-quellen/97142/160 habe ich das zur Diskussion gestellt.

Hello Lex legis, please specify a source for change of the name "Acquarenaparkplatz" to "Acquarenaparkplatz - Parcheggio Acquarena". I have the suspicion that you are simply translating the name, which would not be acceptable in OSM. You need to demonstrate that the name is actually signed or used like that. The same holds true for your other additions of Italian names like e.g. the change of "Solebecken" to "Solebecken - Piscina di acqua salata". I repeat, it is not sufficient to assume that just because street names follow the convention "German name - Italian name" in this region that every POI (and even individual installations of a spa compound) follow the same nomenclature.

Hallo Anonymus1715, bitte versuche doch, bei Deinen Beiträgen etwas sprechendere Kommentare als "Verschiedene Änderungen" zu verwenden - damit man auf einen Blick sieht, was Du gemacht hast. Was deine Edits and Landnutzungsgebieten betrifft, die sind etwas zu feingliedrig für OSM. Mini-Wiesen wie way/1244842678 sind übertrieben. Leider haben andere in diesem Teil Österreichs da in der Vergangenheit viel Murks gemacht mit über-detaillierten Landnutzungsflächen und es wird noch lange dauern, das wieder aufzuräumen - lass dich nicht davon verleiten. OSM ist kein Ausmalbuch für Grünflächen. Auch bei Gebäuden solltest Du es mit der "Genauigkeit" nicht übertreiben; way/113253047 hast Du von einem rechteckigen Gebäude in ein 15-Eck verwandelt, ohne dass wirklich mehr Nutzen entstanden ist.

Dear pseudotsuga1, welcome to OSM and thank you for helping out. We pride ourselves in human-curated data rather than auto-detected machine-learning output. I notice that you're contributing at high volume using various RapID data sources but the quality is below what you can do as a human. For example way/1242503040 which you have added as a dead-end leading nowhere, if you look at the aerial image you will see it connects through to the next settlement. Don't blindly copy AI-detected stuff into OSM - use your brain and triple the value of your contribution.