Actual source: Bing and Mapbox. Sorry.

source = bing, not local_knowledge

source = bing, not local_knowledge

Hey! I see you're also active in the Shreveport area, very nice! Quick question on way/977336558 - why back to building=yes? It is a retail building after all if it's a shop=*?

Hey,

maybe that name would fit better on a separate node inside the building, or the building itself (if it covers the whole building), instead of the address node?

Forgot the sources: Bing, Esri where there's tree cover on buildings

Hey! Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing! Your change looks good (useful info, good changeset message).

There is just one minor thing: Phone numbers should be in international format (e.g. +4319664478). In case you want to map other businesses in the future. See also: phone=*?uselang=en#Usage

Isn't Mömax more of a building=retail? Since they sell furniture...

Hey, sorry to disturb this ancient changeset's eternal rest, but it adds a gate in the middle of some grass which doesn't seem to be visible from aerial imagery (node/2447156513).

I added a note (note/2663395) and user eteb3 told me you're a local, so maybe you can clear that up for me.

Maybe we can also add a note to the node so that passing armchair mappers like me don't get confused :)

I have reverted this changeset at your request: changeset/109485598

Sorry, some landuses went into this changeset as well. I failed to split it into to changesets

Hello,

can you expain where you get this land use from? Satellite imagery seems to not indicate the pattern that you've put - and it looks like writing to me (Farsi script)?

Can you explain your motivation adding this and nearby features?

Welcome to OpenStreetmap! I see you are using StreetComplete - a great way to get into mapping your city! You've got a lot of work ahead of you in Dreieichenhain! Thanks for improving the map, and feel free to reaceh out if you have any questions!

Stimmt, den hab ich da nicht bedacht. Die building parts müssen glaub ich keine eigenen Taggins haben wenn die parts nicht vom Zweck des Restes abweichen. Ich habe einen Umriss für das ganze Gebäude mit building=apartments und dem höchsten Level hier hinzugefügt. Changeset ist hier: changeset/107000516

Danke für die Review!

I see. I'm not a tennis pro, so I've never heard of that. Tagging the "closest" surface as you did makes sense then, I think. You can still use the description field to leave information about the RedCourt, people searching for it may also be looking in that field. Just a free text like "Operator calls the surface 'RedCourt'" or something would be sufficient. It's not strictly necessary though
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106022871

Hi Raul,

I'm glad you've recently joined us in mapping on OSM! However, the surface you have entered here does not appear in the wiki (surface=*) - in fact you're these are the only courts worldwide that use that surface. Maybe you've meant clay or tartan (have a look at the wiki page)? Using agreed-upon values for these tags helps tools and users use the map better. If you got any questions, reply here. Your other changeset with asphalt looks good though :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106022871

Hey - first of all: Thanks for the review. First time editing access restrictions, so I was bound to get something wrong - I'll reread the wiki pages.

We're having a bit of a discussion in my note (note/2694597), coming to a similar conclusion. I've for now followed fkvs suggestion, which is vehicle=private without the psv (the reasoning is in his comment)

Hallo johab,

inwiefern sind die Stiegen nicht relevant? Sind sie denn korrekt? Oder haben sie sich geändert wegen dem neuen Gebäude (die Note habe ich gesehen)?

One minor correction already made - changeset ID 105449862 :)

Ich bin leider komplett ahnungslos, was sowas angeht. :(