False, the tags you mentioned are still there: node/11638849003

Only now they are correctly applied to the barrier node, not a way.

see the discussion here: changeset/166128294#map=19/57.843357/12.312401

reverting changeset/166128773

Hej Archie, vänligen delta i diskussionen och avstå från vandalism.
Hello archie, please engage in discussion and refer from vandalism.
Hallo Archie, bitte beteiligen Sie sich an der Diskussion und sehen Sie von Vandalismus ab.
changeset/166128294#map=19/57.843357/12.312401

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/23V8

I think you still completely fail to understand what I am saying, so maybe english is better for you:

A barrier needs to be a node on the way that it is blocking, otherwise it cannot be parsed by any router.
You can optionally add the barrier as a way, but if the intersection node is not tagged as a barrier it wont work.

från wikin:
Start by placing a tag barrier=block on a node node that's part of an existing way to indicate where the barrier is.

Jag föreslår att du läser avsnittet ”block” först.

https://imgur.com/o0r4ZhX

Jag antar att vi kan behålla barriärvägen, men det verkar bara som dubbel information eftersom den är så kort

Noden i skärningspunkten mellan barriären och stigen var inte taggad, vilket innebär att navigationsprogram inte kan tolka den.

verkligen bra hitta, jag fixade de värden jag tog bort

node/11638849003/history

barriärtaggen var inte på en nod utan på en väg

Good point, I went through them and fixed a few: 2 incorrect tags, 2 closed stores. Thanks for the notice. I will remove this tag from my fix list for future reference

ok great thanks!

amenity="2x pit toilets" is not a great value since it cannot be searched or automatically parsed. I have fixed this but please use "toilet" in future. You can add two seperate toilets if desired and toilets:disposal=pitlatrine

Very sorry, happy to revert if it is desired

Ah shoot, wanted to limit this change to a cluster of mistaken tags around manchester, but I seem to have made a mistake with the bounding box and affected more then expected.

Hey, you tagged this as "non vegetarian" but also with vegan options. This is impossible, could you double check?

Hello, why did you set this restaurant to diet:vegetarian=no and diet:vegan=yes. It seems to be vegan only right? then it should have "only" in both fields.