willkmis's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 152769131 | over 1 year ago | Hi, it looks like you've added an "Ishihara Park" at the intersection of Stewart and Delaware. But Ishihara Park is already mapped a block north of your new area: way/468462659. Is that area what you meant to map? Best,
|
| 153414743 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OSM! Please note that highway=trunk is defined in California, as in most of the US, as a key long distance connection, not by the presence of an interchange. This definition is documented in the wiki: osm.wiki/California/2022_Highway_Classification_Guidelines. Therefore, I don't think this short stretch of Olympic warrants a classification change. Also, it looks like you've dragged the sidewalk near La Cienega/Obama so that it crosses the road. Please take care when modifying ways so that they all align with each other. Thanks!
|
| 153414994 | over 1 year ago | Hi, why did you delete this neighborhood? It certainly exists in real life and is called this by residents. |
| 153388907 | over 1 year ago | Hi, thanks for doing what appears to be a lot of hard work adding all these service roads around the country. In the future, do you think you could try to keep your changesets at bit more local, or maybe state-by-state or region-by-region at least? Having these US-spanning changesets makes it hard for others to tell what's actually been changed where. Thanks!
|
| 129762519 | over 1 year ago | Old changeset I know, but I've just come across this. Are you sure this portion isn't supposed to be HI 2000? I think I saw signs with 2000, and it looks like 200 goes down Kaumana Dr into downtown Hilo. See also wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii_Route_200#Related_route |
| 152662539 | over 1 year ago | Great, thanks for fixing these so fast! |
| 152661307 | over 1 year ago | I'll try raising the issue on OSMUS Slack, I think I've seen folks there post about this effort. Will |
| 152661307 | over 1 year ago | Hi again,
Best,
|
| 152662539 | over 1 year ago | Hi, thanks for doing this import, it seems like it's mostly adding good data to the map. However, in my local area I noticed a couple of errors in these data:
Hopefully these edge cases can help you/the challenge designers better identify more false positives in your data. Will |
| 152523227 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this business to the map. However, I noticed a few issues with your edits, which I tried to correct in my past change, but that you seem to have switched back:
-You also added back the "keywords" tag. This tag has no documented meaning in OSM. Are you aware of a service that uses these keywords, or one that is prompting you to add it to the shop? It would be useful for the community to know about. -The value of the shop= tag is supposed to describe the type of product sold. There are quite a lot of possible values (see shop=*#Shop-specific_information), but "Retail" does not really describe the type of shop. From the website it seems like LA Mart sells mostly decor, so I thought interior_decoration would fit, but maybe there's a more accurate value? If you could describe what is sold in a comment here, that would be helpful. -A small detail, but the correct address format in OSM is to keep the street name alone in addr:street, whereas the unit number should go in addr:unit. It looks like you put the unit number back in the street name. Again, is there some service that's prompting you to do that? Again, welcome to the community, and I hope we can work together to properly represent your business while conforming to OSM standards. Please let me know if there's anything I can help with! Will |
| 151654216 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Is there really a "pond" here? From Bing aerial imagery it looks like a parking lot, is the pond underneath? It looks like in other changes you added multiple ponds to this complex. I only see one in the middle, and it looks more like a swimming pool (leisure=swimming_pool). Is that what you might have meant? Best,
|
| 151630760 | over 1 year ago | No problem! I moved the info you added over to the existing building in this change: changeset/151655920#map=18/34.10194/-118.33940. Thanks for contributing! |
| 151630760 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like Madame Tussaud's is already mapped a couple of blocks over: way/424105889, next to the Chinese Theatre. Is that what you meant to map? I think the existing location is the correct one, unless it's moved since I've last been in the area? Best,
|
| 150278198 | over 1 year ago | I happened to be driving by here today, and I verified that the signs prohibit parking overnight, not during the day. I've fixed it in changeset/150603883 |
| 150278198 | over 1 year ago | Hey, it looks like on this change you added a no parking restriction from 10am-6pm along PCH. Is that really what is signed? Not to doubt you if you just surveyed it, but I feel like I always see cars parked there during the day. Are you sure it wasn't maybe no parking 10pm-6am (i.e. 22:00-06:00 rather than 10:00-18:00) or something? That would seem more likely to me if they don't want people there overnight. The Bing streetside was a bit blurry for me to make out though.
|
| 150192871 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! Quick question: did you mean to delete LaSorted Pizza or was that an accident? |
| 149978652 | over 1 year ago | Hey, yeah I'm leaning that Avalon is now appropriately tagged. What my comment is getting at is that this area has a lot of close-by parallel primaries: Vermont, Figueroa, Main, Avalon and Central. It's possible that their all roughly equally important for crosstown traffic and all thus deserve to be highway=primary. But I tend to find that a lot of the LA area has "too many primaries", and that a more hierarchical scheme, where there are more secondaries than primaries for example, is often a better description of the real relationship between streets in the area. From aerial imagery, it seems like much of Main, Fig, and Central in this area are two through lanes each direction, are they all really equal in importance to Vermont and Avalon, which appear to have 3? I'd guess at least one or two of them is not, but I lack the on-the-ground knowledge to confidently say which. (Though that's not to imply that every road should be tagged strictly by its lane count: there can be relatively wide, unimportant roads and relatively narrow, important roads. But lane count is often correlated with importance) |
| 149746257 | over 1 year ago | Hi Channers,
Will |
| 149746257 | over 1 year ago | Hi, thanks for adding this sushi restaurant to the map! It looks like you might've accidentally changed the whole block to a building in this edit, did you mean to add the restaurant to one building? Best,
|
| 149713985 | over 1 year ago | Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! In this change, it looks like you added crime=robbery and date=* tags to a variety of roads and businesses. Can you clarify what purpose these serve? Note that OpenStreetMap is a public database that records real-world data. -Will |