Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. What is your source for this edit? Also, it looks like there are numerous typos, for example in the name, website, city, and zip code. Please exercise more care in future edits.

All of us are volunteers, and we welcome edits to the project that are from legitimate sources and improve the quality of OSM data. However, a number of players from your game have been recently making low quality edits, often apparently using sources from whom we do not have permission to copy. So the OSM community is quickly becoming suspicious of these sorts of edits. Please use care to learn and follow our guidelines in any future mapping, even if it slows your progress/cash flow in your game.

I went ahead and deleted this parking lot node here: changeset/122229941. The node was extraneous since the parking lot was already mapped as an area anyway.

This comment hasn't yet received a response @Avasquez, what source did you have in making these changes?

I went ahead and reverted this changeset and some others of yours here: changeset/122215905, as they didn't conform to the building naming guidelines and introduced a couple other errors. I then added a retail area around Olvera in this change: changeset/122216013. I don't think I've removed any information that wasn't already in the database, but if there's something missing you felt like you had added, let me know and we can discuss the best tags for it.

As for the tagging of Olvera Street itself, its old tagging (highway=pedestrian) implies no vehicle access, so it was appropriate for this way.

Thanks for responding. In OSM, buildings are only named if they have a formal name in real life, not as descriptions (see, for example the nearby Pico House: relation/12292681). If you want to name a shopping area, it's better to draw an area around it and tag it landuse=retail. I've been to Olvera St many times, so I can say from experience that this tag is appropriate. If you want to tag individual artisan shops, you can add a node at the shop's location with a tag like shop=gift (tourist-oriented items). Or you can use a more specific value, like if they sell art (shop=art) or clothes (shop=clothes). You can see a whole list of shop tags here: shop=*

Hello, when adding a shop to a building with multiple shops, it's better practice to add a node for the shop, rather than adding its tag to the whole building. Also, what is your source for these edits? I can't find anything on the web indicating there's a clothing shop by this name here.

Hi Anthony, if you take a look at the history of this way, you'll see it's gone back and forth between trunk and motorway. Eventually, we decided to adhere to the CA-wide standard of where the "End Freeway" sign is (osm.wiki/California/Map_features). Here, that sign is at Lincoln: node/9523487423. Moreover, this segment has a very low speed limit for a motorway (45 mph). Did you have a reason to upgrade this segment back to motorway?

I changed this bike path back to its previous tagging in changeset/122044823. I'm not sure what you intended, but this definitely isn't a freeway. If you meant to add different information to this way, feel free to comment here and maybe I can help you find an appropriate tag.

Great, thank you for the prompt response!

Fixed in changeset/121998984

Hello, this changeset appears to have broken the ordering of the member ways of the bus route relations along Centinela. Please use caution in the future so as to keep the ordering of the ways in the relations correct when splitting road segments.

Hi, I'm not sure of the tags you've added here. "Operator" is for the company that operates the lot, not a description. So in this case, it might be the City of Los Angeles, or maybe a contractor. Also, what currency is this charge in? I'd be surprised if the fee to park in a public lot was not in US dollars.

Hi. Please do not use the name= tag to describe features. Instead, you can use tags, such as sport=tennis in this case.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you changed this building=industrial to landuse=commercial. The landuse tagging indicates that this is not a building, which I don't think you intended. To indicate a building is used for commercial purposes, use building=commercial (or building=retail if it's a shop). Also, what was your source for this edit?

Hi, it looks like this feature already exists, added by you one month ago: way/421682350. Also if this not currently used as a bank, it should not be tagged as amenity=bank. If you don't mind, I'd like to know your source for these edits.

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! It looks like you changed this bike path (highway=cycleway) to a freeway (highway=motorway). Did you mean to do that, or do you want to make a different change?

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you changed the names and addresses of a number of buildings to all be the same, and in fact deleted one building in a subsequent changeset. Did you mean to name this district instead? Also, what was your motivation in changing Olvera Street from a pedestrian street to a path?

Done as discussed here in changeset/121344263