OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
110759283 about 4 years ago

Gracias por esta respuesta. ¿Tiene algún recurso que apoye la idea de que esta no es la Ruta Nacional 25? Una gran sección de la carretera al norte de aquí (way/918748114, way/683557793, way/375277136, way/182328511, way/742982775, way/914797218, etc.) todavía está marcada como Ruta Nacional 25, ¿debería eliminarse la etiqueta de ref de estos segmentos? ¿En qué punto se detiene la Ruta Nacional 25?

110759283 about 4 years ago

Saludos Orozco,
Veo que eliminó algunas de las etiquetas de ref de las secciones de la Ruta Nacional 25 en Barranquilla (way/407728001, way/227444306, way/378758219, way/375277092, way/401013965), creando etiquetas de ref inconsistentes a lo largo de la carretera.
¿Tienes usted una fuente de datos que podrías compartir, para respaldar estas ediciones?
Gracias.

111792947 over 4 years ago

Sus ediciones en estos conjuntos de cambios me parecen bien. Gracias por este consejo.

111791413 over 4 years ago

Saludos,
Nuevamente, gracias por su atención. Estas ediciones de alineación se realizaron con las trazas de OSM GPS, así como con las imágenes de Strava TMS. Si lo desea, también puedo hacer un esfuerzo para alinear los edificios utilizando esta información.

111792947 over 4 years ago

Saludos,
Muchas gracias por su atención a esta edición. Creé la way987555791 para permitir un giro a la izquierda desde la Calle A en dirección norte hacia la Carretera Interamericana, lo cual fue impedido por la etiqueta de oneway sobre la way31739791. Si cree que esta edición se realizó por error, por favor haga los cambios que considere necesarios. Gracias de nuevo.

107206249 over 4 years ago

Greetings,
The source you cite does not show ref information and the state highway map https://www.putevi-srbije.rs/images/pdf/referentni-sistem/Karta_drzavnih_puteva.pdf disagrees with your edit, showing that highway 100 runs through the center of Stari Žednik. I am going to reapply ref=100 to way/875413258. If you have any source of information indicating that this ref is incorrect, please let me know. Thank you.

108448274 over 4 years ago

Greetings,
Thanks for catching this. I have repaired both relations.

97470233 over 4 years ago

Understood, thank you.

98596381 almost 5 years ago

Greetings Buraddo,
I saw car traffic on this road in a 2020 Mapillary image https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/C82crLMmlG6n2QTwWmnTAg so I felt it was reasonable to mark this as a service road. However, I have no local knowledge. If you feel this way would be better marked as a cycleway or footway, I have no objection to you making that edit.
Thanks!

93247848 about 5 years ago

I'll keep this in mind, thank you!

91848027 about 5 years ago

hi Nemanja,
Thanks for the message. i will make the edit you've suggested.

89755859 about 5 years ago

Greetings,
What is your source for these edits? Is this road currently under construction, or is it in the planning stages? Can you link to a resource that describes this project?
Thanks.

92135372 about 5 years ago

Good morning,
Thanks for letting me know. I'd be happy to mark this street as open, or you can make the edit yourself if you prefer.

55902446 over 5 years ago

Thank you for your feedback.

82847041 almost 6 years ago

Saludos,
Marqué estos caminos como servicio porque su único propósito es proporcionar acceso a una estación de combustible, como se describe en la página wiki highway=service.
Gracias.

80688677 almost 6 years ago

Greetings,
Thank you for your patience with my comments.
The motorway_links you drew in this changeset, way/770623208, way/764195095 are not supported by any imagery I can find, and do not appear in public GPS traces. Are these highways currently under construction? Again, can you provide a link to a resource that supports these edits?
Thank you.

80493607 almost 6 years ago

Greetings,
The motorway_links you drew in this changeset, way/769434588, way/769434589, way/769434590, way/769434591, way/769434592, way/769434593, are not supported by any imagery i can find, and do not appear in public GPS traces.
Additionally, i cannot find any imagery or public GPS traces to confirm the bridge you drew at way/769434608, way/769434609.
Can you cite a resource for these edits?
Thank you.

79698674 almost 6 years ago

Greetings,
When you modified way/764170972 and way/15525399, you disconnected these ways from way/184435160, producing a dead-end. Esri shows these roads as connected. What is the reason for this break in the road? Can you cite a resource for this edit?
Thank you.

80220781 almost 6 years ago

hi 4004,
I moved the barrier:kerb tag to node/1790569474/node 3643504632 adjacent. The barrier:kerb page barrier=kerb says "Combining with highway=crossing is usually a mistake; include kerb=* on the crossing node, but *not* barrier=kerb as there will usually not be a kerb across the major highway".

74037499 over 6 years ago

Greetings Carlins,
Can you provide the resources you used to create the proposed highways here and the motorway at 34.8678347, 33.5972538 in changeset/74037499? I can't find any resources that confirm these are real highways or real planned construction.
Thank you.