OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

vectorial8192's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by vectorial8192

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
5062245 kingkingHK

Is Lantau Link BBI really `access=customers` when way/457969673 way/727099908 way/762041854 and way/172848370 exist?
5077351 vectorial8192

Node node/11530071569 should probably be deleted
5078240 vectorial8192

Name of "house" way/993221815 is very suspicious
5027512 klorydryk

"invisible from the road"
The place has gone or never existed. A CoMaps user reported that the POI was visible on the map (see snapshot date below), but was not found on the ground.
OSM snapshot date: 2025-09-06T09:48:08Z
POI has no name
POI types: highway-path
#CoMaps android
5038060 vectorial8192

I feel like this mall should have a name, but maybe I am wrong.
5039442 kingkingHK

I suspect that it is legal to cycle from way/116287569 to way/835665902
5065720 kingkingHK

Does this node/4349312890 actually exist? Which routes call here?
5065723 kingkingHK

Does this node/4349317190 actually exist?
4691875 Kenkton

"Capsule hostel."
OSM snapshot date: 2025-02-27T10:33:49Z
POI name: Sleep HKG
POI types: tourism-hostel internet_access-wlan
#organicmaps android
5074863 vectorial8192

Wang Fuk Court:

ref=A to ref=G needs to be reviewed whether they are actually `abandoned=yes` or `ruined=yes`.

Preliminary reports by structural engineers are indicating `abandoned=yes`, but full report is not out yet.