OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
43483993 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43494077 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! For better description of your objects please read natural=wetland !

43494368 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! For better description of your object please read place=neighbourhood !

43494378 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!

40069707 about 9 years ago

Hallo! Du hast am Weg way/51693986/history den Tag high=0,38 und height=0.38 ergänzt. Können wir den Tippfehler (high=0,38) löschen?

41794783 about 9 years ago

Hello! Did you mean highway=track instead high=track on way way/439844551 ?

40515505 about 9 years ago

Hello, did you mean height instead high ?

Hallo, meinst Du height anstatt high ?

40677412 about 9 years ago

Hello, please check the way way/430532993 . Did you mean highway instead high or did you mean height ?

42510180 about 9 years ago

in the web the changset number directly next to the version number.

I found this mistake with tool taginfo.openstreetmap.org using the button overpass turbo (or directly https://overpass-turbo.eu).

43465417 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! In the most cases we don’t pain the area, we paint the street (as line) and describe this with the necessary keys. Only the parking slot (see way/451895119) is paint as area (but with other keys).

43463788 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43468081 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43463164 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43460265 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43458953 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43458089 about 9 years ago

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

43456311 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.

43455096 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM For better description of your object please read man_made=mast .

43454826 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! Eleven buildings withe the some house number??

43453253 about 9 years ago

Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page osm.wiki/How_to_map_a.

Example: Tennis court osm.wiki/Tag:==> leisure=pitch, sport=tennis

Please connect the new highways with the existing highways.