user_5359's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175737578 | 11 days ago | Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved two nodes more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
|
| 175742444 | 11 days ago | It clearly states ‘can’ and not ‘must’. Note that there must always be a four-digit year for the possible end date, so that the end date is always (!) clearly recognisable. Historical special regulations should be abandoned. |
| 175685898 | 12 days ago | Hello! It does not make sense to use two keys for the same function. Incidentally, the documented key is order:strahler (see https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=strahler). Bonjour ! Il n'est pas judicieux d'utiliser deux clés pour la même fonction. La clé documentée est d'ailleurs order:strahler (voir https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=strahler). |
| 175679041 | 12 days ago | In general, routing lorries with standard routing software for cars is problematic. Weight, length and height are not taken into account here. There is no remedy for this type of user. Nevertheless, you should try to consistently enter all restrictions on the map. By the way, by Thomas Road, do you mean the road way/18981395? When editing, please note that the city limits relation/182570 and the road way/704239774 (and the other ways of the aforementioned road) largely overlap. When making changes, it is easy to select the wrong way. |
| 175672767 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on way/1456925673. What is the mean of the tag état = ruine ? You cannot mean the etat key (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/etat), as it has different values. |
| 175685898 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on way/1456993839. What is the mean of the key strahler? Did you mean order:strahler? |
| 175233473 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on way/1454396609 (one of three objetcs). What is the mean of the tag tug= designated? |
| 175638239 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on way/351136480. What is the mean of the tag rkd:eid? |
| 174933550 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on https://www.os.org/way/884516982. What is the mean of the the key railway:otc ? Did you mean railway:ctc? |
| 175340195 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on node/3044538941. Did you have any source for the value of the key population:212 ? |
| 175610269 | 12 days ago | Hello! Please have a look on way/501155583 (one of fourteen objects). What is the mean the tag ADDR2 = Plawsworth Gate? |
| 175679041 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on node/196594563. This is an awkward description. No software reads the description in junction nodes. But why are you drawing a road over an existing road and railway line (way/1456960365)? |
| 175681434 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on relation/19935053. You need two ways (role from, to) and one point (exists, but without the role via). The first realtion relation/19935052 is correct. |
| 175684575 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! |
| 175684505 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |
| 175684358 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |
| 175684328 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |
| 175684301 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |
| 175684271 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |
| 175684236 | 12 days ago | Welcome to OSM! PRIVATE isn't the name of this way! Please use in future the tag access=private for the correct notation. |