user_5359's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 43636438 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43634980 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43632733 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43630625 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43630317 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43629763 | about 9 years ago | Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359 |
| 43638354 | about 9 years ago | Willkommen bei OSM! Für eine bessere Beschreibung bitte die Seite osm.wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant lesen. |
| 43617022 | about 9 years ago | Willkommen bei OSM! Das Wort „Unterflurhydrant“ ist kein Name sondern eine Beschreibung. Die korrekte Form der Beschreibung findet ihr unter osm.wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant. Das Thema Wasserleitung ist mit Sicherheit keine Relation type= multipologon. Kennt Ihr auch die openfiremap.org (bitte entsprechend dem Link im obrigen Artikel folgen)? Damit könnt Ihr Eure Einträge schnell auf Erfolg kontrollieren. |
| 43578483 | about 9 years ago | change barier to barrier |
| 43583392 | about 9 years ago | change add:postode -> addr:postcode |
| 43592078 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page osm.wiki/How_to_map_a. Please read leisure=fitness_centre , too. |
| 43590665 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. |
| 43590691 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. And please add the key religion and denomation to the building (see religion=christian) |
| 43561215 | about 9 years ago | Hallo! Ich habe gearde Deine Änderung zurückgedreht, weil ich nicht glaube, dass der ganze Ort ein Edika Markt ist. |
| 43583495 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page osm.wiki/How_to_map_a. Did you mean leisure=bowling_alley ? |
| 40797638 | about 9 years ago | Hello! Short question to node/4307293565 : shop=gift oder shop=candles ? |
| 43575496 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM (agin)! I have delte your name only node „adwqasdsds“. Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. |
| 43575451 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node. And: The cahnegset comment „test1“ doesn’t describe very well, what you have done! |
| 43575386 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think the guesthouse exists in the middle of a street. |
| 43561046 | about 9 years ago | Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information. |