OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
172770349 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SPAM entry on the street crossing.

172770367 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! I reverted your SPAM entry on the street crossing.

172771878 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node node/9860298397
more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

172611817 3 months ago

IIn this case, I would suggest name:Cars_Regionaux_Nouvelle-Aquitaine

172611817 3 months ago

Hello! Please have a look on node/3905242993 (one of four objects). What is the mean of the tag "name:Cars Régionaux Nouvelle-Aquitaine" = "Lezons 2000". Did you mean loc_name?

172726947 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your addition!
I had to correct your location. The keys must be entered one per line.
The point should be to the right or left of the road (i.e. not part of the road).

172729831 3 months ago

Hello (again)! Please check also the restriction relation relation/10993475. She miss the role from

172729831 3 months ago

Hello! Please check the oneway way/1434764822. It appears to be an impassable section.

172709639 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node node/11639972507 more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

172713068 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node node/1925455810
more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

172720980 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the node node/2823770487
more than 100 meters over streets and buildings.
I moved the node back to the original position.

171337725 3 months ago

The statement that online shops are not allowed is not correct.
Online shops without an address and massive amounts of SPAM are undesirable because they do not exist for OSM topics (and cannot be validated).
Likewise, labelling it as amenity=marketplace is certainly incorrect (the tag office=online_shop would be more correct).
If you don't mind, I would re-enter it with the key office.

169230259 3 months ago

Entschuldige die peinliche Verspätung!

Ich habe "nur" den Schlüssel beim Tag "highway=crossing"="path" (s. Version 1) korrigiert und mich für die erste der beiden Möglichkeiten entschieden.

Laut Taginfo wird übrigens highway=crossing zu 90% bei Wegen und 10% bei Knoten verwendet.

Umabhängig von der "Wichtigkeit" darfst dies auch ändern, denn auch ich bin nur ein Mensch und bin nicht fehlerfrei.

172669895 3 months ago

I have made the changes (using JOSM). You are welcome.

172686010 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM!
I consider the entry of point-like parks with single-digit numbers or three-digit letter combinations without further comment to be vandalism and have accordingly deleted all your changes of this kind. Please refrain from making any further entries if these are not visible on the aerial photograph and a source is commented on.

172669895 3 months ago

Welcome to OSM! Please be careful! You moved the two nodes node/12030019051, node/12132571436 more than 100 meters. Please check the correct position

172479745 3 months ago

Nö, siehe Kommentar zu Version 14 "changes tag Rolf:levels to roof:levels"

172547584 3 months ago

I am already familiar with this topic. Everyone else only uses gtfs:stop_id:<country>-<operator> and gtfs:stop_name:<country>-<operator>(*). You use
gtfs:stop_id:<country>-<operator>,
gtfs:shape_id:<country>-<operator>,
gtfs:route_id:<country>-<operator> (duplicate to ref).

That's why I suspected that this was a detail of the source that should be noted under the key source. You seem to have confirmed this for me.

(*) The stop may have a different name locally, especially if several operators use the stop.

171017279 3 months ago

Please answer my questions about the meaning of the keys.

172530496 3 months ago

Hello! What is the mean of the tags
proyecto_escuelas_argentina = yes
sotm_lujan2025 = yes
?