Hello! Please have a look on way/1327635106. What is the mean of Road=1. Please notice, a street or road of footway has always the key highway! Is the name a reference or a notation of the priority?

Ich habe die Änderungen durch geführt, weil Dein Schlüssel bluetooth als neuer Schlüssel in der entsprechenden Statistik von mueschel auftaucht. Warum Du Deine Unterstellung von selbst gefälschter Statistik nicht erst mal mit mir klären kannst (, was praktisch wegen meiner Inaktivität nicht möglich ist, ) kann ich mir nur durch fehlende Diskussionsfähigkeit von Deiner Seite erklären. Falls Du es nicht weiß, selbstverständlich kannst Du gerne „Deine“ Paketstationen mit „Deinem“ Schlüssel tagen (vergiss aber nicht den Schlüssel note mit Erläuterung). Aber der Verweis auf die Wikiseite kannst Du Dir sparen, weil diese auch Fehler enthalten können.

Ja, leider kann die Dokumentation auch nicht immer mithalten. Ich habe mich an die Statistik gehalten
https://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=bluet.
Aktuell
301 authentication:bluetooth
5 bluetooth
Die Doku dazu findest Du unter authentication:*=*

Hello! Please use the key authentication:bluetooth instead of bluetooth

Hello! Please have a look on way/1381234337. What is the mean of Weiler = Trafostation 902 Zargen Wolf?

Hallo! Sieht Dir bitte nochmal den way/159882313 (einer von zwei Wegen) an. Wieso führst Du den Tag DE:1022-10 = yes ein, da er bereits unter sidewalk:left:traffic_sign = DE:239,1022-10 notiert wurde?

Hello! Please have a look on node/12785892290. What is the mean of the tag Denver = Hayes?

Welcome to OSM! I revert your entry, see changeset/165472433 !

I would like to point out the crucial colon after the capital US. The country code after ref indicates the region where this abbreviation is used. Theoretically, you could also use ref:US:usfsw.

Hello, please only use the key highway (instead of highways) for roads. Also note that only the defined values (see Wiki) are shown in the maps. The roads with highway=goreto do not appear on the map. What is the correct translation of goreto? (see way/1374477961/history) I am happy to help you visualise the roads.

Hello! Please have a look on way/1380324288, way/1380322531. What is the mean of the tags
Bosque Protector = #FF0000
Code = 080501
Create Date = 23 abr 2019 11:05:55
Group = Cacao ingerto ccn51
Type = area

Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on node/12784656039 (one of for objects with the key altura). I assume this is a tree.
altura = 27 (means?)
circumference = 1.30 (other have two values)
deameter crowm = 11 (did you mean diameter_crown)
name = Eucalipto (a tree with name? Did you mean species:es)

If your changes are part of a school programme, please inform the person in charge: Other trees on the school grounds have also been marked with names.

Please have also a look on natural=tree

Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22Xw . What is the mean of the tag Year=2015? (lowercase needed). But there is no additional description of the line.

Hello! Please have a look on https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/22Xu. What is the mean of the tag true=A?

Hello! Please have a look on way/1380615363. What is mean of the tag 116 = 179?

Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal den Weg way/1380332612 an. Du hast den Tag buildingd=5.0 eingetragen, den ich aktuell in fixme verschoben habe. Eine Korrektur nach building wäre fachlich falsch.

My recommendation would be that you use a standard key such as fixme or note instead of your own key and transfer your abbreviation to the value.

Hello! You use the key ref:usfws in combination with the source (Fish and Wildlife Service). I assume the correct spelling of the key could be ref:US:fws.

Please have a look at ref=*. The keys in the group ref are supplemented by a country (or possibly organisation) abbreviation for better validation and to avoid different meanings. This is followed by a detailing according to the person responsible for the data, in your case as suggested ref:US:eff. The prefix unsigned only indicates that the value cannot be found on the mast (if a mapper wants to check it). In this combination they are of course new, but the structure allows an interpretation of the meaning even without detailed knowledge.

Okay, it seems unclear whether the TowerX value is also present on the mast or just an internal numbering in the data set. Personally, I would mark values from the mast as ref:US:eff and use the unsigned_ref:US:eff key in the second case. I personally see the source:ref key as problematic because the attribution key was used instead of source. But you are welcome to discuss this on your standard channels, but please don't invent any new formation logics (such as source:eff_ref).

The additional note for the values of the ‘surveillance:type’ key is also appropriate. The standard values are written in lower case. And AI is not a visible sensor but describes the data processing of the recorded data. I would generally delete this value, as it cannot be validated.