Willkommen bei OSM! Deien Aussage ist so nicht ganz richtig: siehe way/211014400, aber dies ist tatsächlich ein Definitionsfall.

In dem Zusammenhang: Hast Du die Notiz note/863792 gesehen?

Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset, because I din’t believe that a church is build over the existing streets.

Welcome to OSM! A swimming pool didn’t have a address. Please move the address to the main building of the property.

Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think he shop exists in the middle of a parking area.

Welcome to OSM! Don't add private post box to OSM.

Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!

Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path.

Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street.

Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page osm.wiki/How_to_map_a.

I see a Swimmingpool on the aerial images ...

one example way/471511639/history

Welcome to OSM! Don’t paint not existing objects!

Welcome to OSM! Don’t paint no existing parks! I see residential buildings on the aerial images.

Welcome to OSM! Don’t paint no existing parks! I see residential buildings on the aerial images.

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

Welcome to OSM! The correct description of a park isn’t park=<name>! Use leisure=park and name=<name>.

Welcome to OSM! Please don’t paint a way twice. If there is a dead end, then paint a new path.

I have delete your try and add a new version.

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359

Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359