Hi Ryan Crappa,

Welcome to the OpenStreetMap world :)

I can see that you have added a lot of building=residential by tagging multiple buildings. There are two ways to tag these buildings as residential. One is to map/trace each building individually and tag each of them as building=residential. The second is the easiest way you can draw the a boundary covering all the buildings and then tagging them as landuse=residential, I have correct the data using the second method. Going forward you can do the same too if you find it difficult to map buildings individually. If you want some guidance on mapping, you can always comment on this changeset or direct message me. I will be more than happy to help :)

You can also go through this beginners guide which will give you a better perspective about OpenStreetMap - http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/.

Happy mapping,
Nikhil Prabhakar

Hi JohnChung07,

Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. You have added `area=yes` for a building in this changeset. The correct tag to use is `building=yes`. I have corrected this change this time. In future when you add a building, you can use `building=yes` instead of `area=yes`. Why don't you also go through this guide for beginners in OpenstreetMap -> http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ ? This guide will give you a great introduction to OpenStreetMap. And also you can always message me or reply to this comment if you have any questions. I will be more than happy to help :)

Happy mapping and Best Regards,
Nikhil Prabhakar

Hi DbDan,

I have observed that you have added a `natural=cliff` in the middle of the city. It would be great if you could add data which are authentic to OpenStreetMap. I am deleting this data. Please let me know if you have any questions on how to add data to OpenStreetMap, I would be more than happy to help you : ) . You could also go through -> http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ and learn more about OpenStreetMap and how you can contribute.

Regards,
Nikhil

Hi Fonchy,
Greeting on behalf of the OpenStreetMap community. I have come accross this changeset where you have deleted a lot of buildings. It looks like you have deleted buildings which was not traced properly. Is that the reason? It would be great if you could confirm the reason for this deletion.

Regards,
Nikhil

Hi Sasha_SH,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Glad that you have been adding data actively to the largest data projects in history. I noticed that with this changeset, you have added a lot of details to the this area. But you seem to have deleted the old data and added new ones instead of editing the current data. You also seem to have deleted a lot of buildings that was having `building=construction`. May I know the reason for this please.

You can visualize your changeset changes in OSMCHA: http://osmcha.mapbox.com/46066260/

Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil Prabhakar

Hi Trigpoint,

Excuse me for the late reply, I have removed the turn circle as per your feedback. Please have a look and lemme know if everything else is correct in this area. And thanks a lot for pointing this out.

Regards,
Nikhil

Small typo in the changeset source, the satellite imagery used is Mapbox Satellite.

Thanks for the correction Minh. Lemme know if you need any help with the clean up if you are encountering more of this.

I re-added the same tags again to make it properly render in JOSM.

Hi Zeke76,

I found that within this changeset, you may have accidentally deleted the tags for the Beaver Lake which I corrected in this changeset (changeset/39257951).

Regards,
Nikhil

Typo in the changeset comment, the data for this area was fixed by realigning the road as per the Tiger Delta data and Strava Globalheat Map.

That is great jpmartin. Lemme know if you need any help from me.

- Nikhil

Hi jpmartin,

I don't think these are villages. All of these looks like neighbourhoods. Can you please share the source used to make these changes?

Nothing to be fixed.

Hi Bubalici,

The proper way to tag a road which is under construction is to add highway=construction instead of the highway=tertiary_link. This road seems to be tagged as highway= tertiary_link with access=no. Because of the access no, some of the OSRM routes are failing. Can you please confirm if this road is actually under construction still?

Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil

Hi ENSG Battir,

Can you please confirm the source and also tell if this is a documented import? Couldn't find any information online. Kindly revert.

Regards,
Nikhil

I can see that this changeset deleted a bunch of service roads for this area. Can you please confirm why you have deleted the service roads for this parking area? I can see that the road exists as per the Bing satellite imagery and you haven't provided any source or changeset comment.

Hi Brait,

This is great trace! Going forward can you please specify the "Source" and a changeset comment on what you did please?

Hi Elia Z,

I have observed that some data has been deleted for this area through this changeset.
Can you please provide the source and reason for deleting the data?

Hi thexburnsx,

I have observed that you have deleted almost every highway=residential roads in this area. Can you please tell me why you have deleted the roads for this area? And also, it would be much more helpful if you have added changeset comment and source explaining what and why you have made a particular change to OSM.