1. elements of two intersections

    Closed
    #27342703 82 42 10 0
  2. oneway traffic (includes bicycyles) is divided form contraflow cycling by files of bollards

    Closed
    #27341391 72 20 1 1
  3. ± compulsoriness of cycleways deliberately redundant : roadlines bicycle=use_sidepath vs. the necessary couterpart bicycyle=yes, cycletrack lines bicycle=designated vs. yes (Lübeck scheme) plus innovative & clear cycleway=obligatory vs. facultative

    Closed
    #27340169 2 72 0 1
  4. western end of the bridge

    Closed
    #27217162 3 5 0 0
  5. from the small roundabout to the western end of the bridge, the road has two unidirectzional facultative cycletracks and a soft cycle lane. At Schwachh.Heerstr., the cycle lane continues into a marked bicycyle crossing with a separate tr.signal

    Closed
    #27139734 32 26 1 0
  6. direction of the roadline adapted (correction forgotten after the vandalism); + northern sidewalk

    Closed
    #27123048 1 5 0 0
  7. recent own reseach: cycleway no more obligatory and no more bidirectional. New Schutzstreifen for cycling westward, tagged "soft_lane", hoping for a second voting. "bicycle:oneway" only on carriagew., see EN WIki. Separately drawn c'way better evaluated

    Closed
    #27122508 45 13 3 0
  8. recent own reseach: cycleway no more obligatory and no more bidirectional. New Schutzstreifen for cycling westward, tagged "soft_lane", hoping for a second voting. Cross connections not yet complete. Bus 31 actively not touched.

    Closed
    #27106687 44 26 3 0
  9. Where cycling on the carriageway is only allowed in the oneway direction, "oneway:bicycle=no" is wrong. And "cycleway=opposite_track" is rendered like "cycleway=opposite", which generally indicates, that there is no special track or lane.

    Closed
    #26956494 40 26 1 0
  10. width

    Closed
    #26955903 0 3 0 0
  11. West of the last garden entrance, that way is signposted with sign 240 "shared foot- and cycleway", not with 260 "motor vehicles prohibited".

    Closed
    #26918914 0 2 0 0
  12. new bicycle crossing (since one or two years)

    Closed
    #26867505 0 1 0 0
  13. new bicycle crossing (since one or two years)

    Closed
    #26866164 2 2 0 0
  14. Schöpfwerk Huchting-Nord

    Closed
    #26865734 0 1 0 0
  15. recent own research; the nameless street between Bauerland and Ortkampsweg has now (yesterday) the same surface and designation as in Goole Streetview

    Closed
    #26865093 5 11 0 0
  16. oneway:bicyle=no würde bedeuten, dass auf der Fahrbahn gegen die Einbahnrichtung geradelt werden dürfe. Hier ist aber nicht opposite_lane, sondern opposite track. Falsch gerendert wird aber wahrscheinlich auch das (semi-)korrekte Tagging.

    Closed
    #26824815 0 4 0 0
  17. The connections between Papenstraße and the northern sidewalk of Knochenhauerstr. – Wegesende had been forgotten by prior mappers.

    Closed
    #26582976 5 9 3 0
  18. cycleway=opposite_track did not the job: The opposite track was not rendered at all. The contra-flow cycling was rendered wrongly like ZE. 267 + 1022-10. Furthermore the mapping of Ansgaritor triangle was nonsense.

    Closed
    #26582850 41 24 1 0
  19. Verdeutlichung der von etlichen Nutzern nicht verstandenen Verkehrsregelung

    Closed
    #26572381 38 28 1 0
  20. Die frei zugänglichen Flächen reichen bis unter die Kolonnaden des Hauses der Bürgerschaft.

    Closed
    #26571046 7 29 17 0