1. I'd liked to tag it better, but I didn't find better tags.

    Closed
    #25693533 1 1 0 0

  2. tagging of cycletracks now compatible with both, use-sidepath-scheme and Lübeck scheme

    Closed
    #25693008 7 93 1 0

  3. Fahrbahnen neben RW ohne B-Pflicht: bicycle=yes, Parkalle nördl d Stern, Schwachh Ring, Kirchbachstr seit Mitte 2014, andere bevor "use sidewalk" erfunden wurde

    Closed
    #25690135 3 118 0 0

  4. angelegt als highway=unclassified, aber seit Jahren für Motoverkehr (außer Straßenerhaltung) gesperrt

    Closed
    #25688525 0 1 0 0

  5. Beneckendorffallee Bordsteinabsenkungen; Heinrich-Baden-W. & H.-Allgeier-W. Breiten; Wohnwege Bocholter & Gladbecker Str. NW für LKW aber ohne Bordsteinabsenkungen

    Closed
    #25675852 17 33 4 0

  6. Mitarbeiter-Parkplatz der BSAG

    Closed
    #25664092 17 5 0 0

  7. keine B-pflicht (wie auch viele Bremer Haupstraßen); in T30-zone Radverkehr auf der Fahrbahn nach StVO essenziell -> eigentlich sind die meisten Wohnsammelstraßen in HB so zu taggen

    Closed
    #25662977 0 2 0 0

  8. Zeichen 240

    Closed
    #25662802 0 1 0 0

  9. eindeutig ausgeschildert als Fußweg und reiner Radweg

    Closed
    #25662749 3 5 2 0

  10. Nordwärts geknickte Abschnitte von Gladbecker Straße und Bocholter Straße Wohnwege ohne Bordsteinabsenkungen zum Fahrbahnbereich. Anbindung Wohnwegs Gladbecker Str. an Gehweg Aachener Str. durch Grünstreifen von Fahrbahn getrennt.

    Closed
    #25662580 9 12 5 0

  11. track type

    Closed
    #25659611 0 1 0 0

  12. crucial tag :)

    Closed
    #25651187 1 2 0 0

  13. some more widthes

    Closed
    #25642317 0 3 0 0

  14. Das entscheidnede Tag war noch nicht korrigiert :(

    Closed
    #25642252 0 1 0 0

  15. "highway=ath" for clearly defined cycleways misleads renderers & readers, therefore it is destructive. "highway=cycleway" + "sidewalk=right" is legitime, as it does not mislead any renderer or reader.

    Closed
    #25642177 0 2 0 0

  16. "Path" for clearly defined cycleways misleads renderers & readers, ergo destructive. Cycleway + sidewalk=right legitime as it does not mislead. All cycleways Parkallee no more compulsory. oneway:bicyle=yes alloed but not rendered

    Closed
    #25641336 4 20 1 0

  17. Tagging clearly defined cycleways as path is no legitimate alternative as it misleads renderers & readers. Cycleway+sidewalk is legitime as it does not mislead. All cycleways along Parkallee are no more compulsory since mit 2014.

    Closed
    #25640785 0 13 0 0

  18. section restored that I had to delet to be able to fullfill the last storage

    Closed
    #25635787 3 10 2 0

  19. vandalism repaired: deleted widthes; tagging independent cycleways & cycletracks as paths misleads renderers & users, cycleway+footway/sidewalk does not + work in progress.

    Closed
    #25635739 6 15 4 0

  20. 2 tram platforms + area=yes (as recommended) "Mäusetunnel" + lit=yes (recent research)

    Closed
    #25614038 0 3 0 0