that's a very strange change especially making
1049366884 way the wall. I intend to remove that

messed up the changeset's message:
added sidewalks in Lyons

Hello, it's of course a mistake. fixed, thanks for checking!

Ah ok. yeah I think some maps may be getting addresses from the public address database which has it incorrect for whatever reason. hopefully if you update it in OSM they'll switch to the correct ones (but it's not guaranteed).

just a heads up, I don't think it's a right approach to add name of the apartment complex/neighborhood to every building (not sure why it was done this way for some other buildings in vicinity)
I added name of the complex to the residential area instead (with web address) which I think should be enough
way/1015680373

Otherwise welcome to the OSM community you may find some information specific for Michigan here osm.wiki/Michigan
and if you feel like it there are also online meetups

Hi, sure, fixed now. Thanks for checking

you can seee actual changes from this changeset here https://osmcha.org/changesets/115385676/

I checked your change history and as far as I understand from it is that you're talking about this building
way/1015680380

And indeed I added it 2 years ago. here https://osmcha.org/changesets/115401350/
but I'm pretty sure there was no addresses set before I added the building footprint.

I added footprints by aerial imagery and I have no knowledge of actual street addresses of the buildings I added. if you know these addresses you can add them yourself.
If we're talking about your house, since there are townhouses then, I'd guess, it's better to either to split the building and add addresses for each part of it or add addresses as points
you're also very welcome to install https://streetcomplete.app/ app to your phone and add addresses to the buildings in your neighborhood

are you sure this changeset is the problem? it was made 2 years ago and I'm reasonably sure I didn't touch the addresses. just added building footprints and changed the roads geometry slightly.

sorry i mean it was definitely not intended like that
here is a fix changeset
changeset/143071538

definitely not. thanks for checking, fixed

thanks for checking. updated

Thanks! and also thank you for checking other admin_level buildings and the discussion! much appreciated

I mean I don't particularly mind removing the tag per se, it's pretty obvious what the building is. but I'm not sure that removing it is the right approach. I think the tag is descriptive and used correctly in a reasonably documented way... I don't think it's a good argument that other building are not marked like that in US (and are there buildings marked with different admin_level?). I don't see why should the correct, even if unusual, data fit your query instead of the other way around

I didn't add the admin_level tag as far as I remember. but anyway sounds like you may want to update your query

see admin_level=*
(Usage with office=government + government=*)

yeah i changed my nickname here about half a year ago:) and i'm a frequent visitor to Michigan mappers meeting

well i guess not really. i've seen it made this way in a few places and continued to use it this way for a while but i supppose adding level tag l to the building is probably a better way to do it

Hi, thanks for letting me know. removed these tags in the change set changeset/125059769

also don't know heights of porches and small domes at the sides

Hello,

Yeah I think I did it a bit freely. I see that you already rolled back some of that. I'll revisit this change soon
Highway classification effort
osm.wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
was discussed on the Michigan mappers meeting last Wednesday and I tried to base it on
osm.wiki/Michigan
https://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/nfc/#
still some of it is obviously incomplete. but yeah I guess I was too eager doing that.

Thank you for your vigilance

Not sure I understand, I still see the connection in iD editor. did you requested the reversion of the changeset? That's fine too but deleting the connection by hand would be enough, I'd say.

Hello Halfdeaf007,
one way part of East Malcolm X street was disconnected from the Aurelis road after the latest construction on the site
see discussion based on the survey
changeset/119520515
Please revert the change