Again what is the source of this edit? Surely to determine where bikes are allowed you would need to either survey the signs or use mapillary or streetside?
For example if bikes were prohibited on https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=59568a4b-9ba1-46b6-a696-9edf6113d567&cp=53.226286~-4.26019&lvl=19&dir=97.05397&pi=0.60837555&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 then there would be a sign here https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=59568a4b-9ba1-46b6-a696-9edf6113d567&cp=53.226286~-4.26019&lvl=19&dir=97.05397&pi=0.60837555&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027

Cheers Phil

Why?
Bikes are only prohibited through Colwyn Bay and the tunnels.

Cheers Phil

True, it is tagged with bicycle=yes and psv=yes, so was correct. Taxis and buses are both covered by psv.

Adding notor vehicle=designated has made the bus only way routable for cars.

The access tags had been fine for the last 13 years.

I have fixed it.

I also removed the motor vehicle=designated which was added by JackW as that had made it routeable for cars.

Is there really a legal (signed) turn restriction here?

With josm, select the existing way and then revert selection and restore deleted objects. I can do it if you want or give it a go yourself.

Wellington Platform 3 is not disused in that it has tracks and a working departure board, not sure what services use it though.

JackW's addition of motor_vehicle=designated is certainly wrong and should be removed.

It is longer than a pedestrian island, and is probably one of the earliest modal filters in OSM having existed for 13 years. This deletion should be reverted to preserve history.
It can be adjusted to look better if necessary but has always been correct.

Hi
Just wondering why you have removed way/41603394 ?
The road is certainly divided at that point and this allows only buses to travel along here from North to South.

This edit is very wrong, there is no physical separation, therefore there should only be one way. As you have mapped this traffic would be unable to access the petrol station without going onto the A5223 roundabout, which is incorrect.

Hi
The website link doesn't work, are you sure it exists as all I can find is a facebook page.

Cheers Phil

Hi Hannah
Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.

One small problem, in order for a path to be used it needs to be connected to other ways. For some reason you have stopped short of the roads at either end.

If you need any help please feel to ask.

Cheers Phil

Again there is no legal turn restriction here.

This junction was correctly mapped before, what are you trying to achieve?

There are no separated ways crossing the junction as you have mapped it.

This edit needs to be reverted.

Cheers Phil

I have reverted this edit. There is no physical separation so mapping two ways is wrong and your change has broken pedestrian routing.

Cheers Phil

Again why?

There is no turn restriction here.

Cheers Phil

Whilst not 'normal', there is no legal restriction on U turns here.

Turn restrictions should reflect only legal restrictions.

Cheers Phil

Why? It was correct previously.

The physical separation does not cross Glenfield Road and there are not two sets of lights.

This edit should be reverted.

Cheers Phil