OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
43767598 about 9 years ago

Should be fixed

44160417 about 9 years ago

Is this really a public car park? Have you surveyed it. Looking at imagery it looks like it is private parking space for the surounding houses.

20951303 about 9 years ago

Is way/42740901 really 2 lanes, I remember it being quite a narrow single track road and thats certainly how it looks on bing imagery. Did you survey it?

44177724 about 9 years ago

Reverting no response again

44177724 about 9 years ago

Please stop adding personal marker to OpenStreetMap, there are no Alpine Huts in London.

44181230 about 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however we tag disused things as disused:shop, disused:amenity etc. That tells the render not to render them. Changing the name implies there is an object called Empty, which is no the case.
Happy mapping, Phil

44181330 about 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however you do need to tag the objects you add. As a minimum they will need building=yes, area=yes isn't needed very often.
Cheers Phil

44168483 about 9 years ago

Hi, do you have any more detail for this hotel, such as a phone number. Also please could you capitalise names properly, all lowercase means others will have to clean up.

44166646 about 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however Tesco Express is already mapped, way/223063426.
Tesco Express is normally mapped as shop=convienience, supermarket is used for larger shops.
I have removed the duplicate.

44158610 about 9 years ago

Thank you, looks interesting.
Hope you find number 7.
Cheers Phil

44158610 about 9 years ago

Hi, these artworks look a bit odd. Please can you explain?

44151822 about 9 years ago

In this case the tags are obsolete as they are defined as relations but when reversing way please to look at the tags to ensure they still make sense.
Cheers Phil

43930398 about 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map objects which exist in the real world, we do not make things up and we do not add fantasy names to objects.
Your edits make me suspicious that you are not mapping what really exists.

43930384 about 9 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we map objects which exist in the real world, we do not make things up and we do not add fantasy names to objects.
Your edits make me suspicious that you are not mapping what really exists.

44151822 about 9 years ago

Hi, thank you for your edit however when reversing ways it is good to also look at the other tags on the way you are reversing. This is particulary important when the way forms a boundary. We now have Wales on the left of this stream and England on the right. That is not right.
Cheers Phil

44134357 about 9 years ago

Are you sure about the spelling?

44135985 about 9 years ago

Hi, please could you make your changeset comments a bit more meaningful, Added Additional Information say absolutely nothing.
Also please don't join landuse polygons to the centreline of the road. It makes the map harder to maintain. and landuse stops at the edge of the road.
Thanks Phil

44072247 about 9 years ago

Again, can I get my car repaired at an ambulance station? It seems unlikely.

44072334 about 9 years ago

Hi, does the surgery have a actual name? Doctors Surgery is a description rather than a name.
And can I really take my car to an Ambulance Station to be repaired?

39545272 about 9 years ago

If you have driven it, and seen the signs, then that is the ultimate in good data.
Routes are mapped as relations that combine the ways, there are many examples in OSM, such as the National Cycle Network. Tagging signs will not mean anything, especially a node with just a reference, chances are they will be removed as the only way to find them will be to trawl back through the change history.
Signs should be mapped as man_made=sign and put in their actual position, rather than the centreline of the road, although in this case we tend to just go with the relation.
If you need any help creating that, just ask.