trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 123421872 | over 3 years ago | My local post office node/2636954315/history had the correct opening hours and is mapped as a separate node so as you you say should have the opening hours of the counter but now has a strange version of the supermarket opening hours. Its open until 22:00.
Phil |
| 123421872 | over 3 years ago | This edit is not very helpful, the information is very misleading and gives a false impression of opening hours.
|
| 123350353 | over 3 years ago | Hi, this changeset seems a little odd. Why have you added layer=1 to Tesco, it is very much on the ground. |
| 123274438 | over 3 years ago | Hi, thank you for your edit however the cafe is already mapped and I have removed your duplication.
|
| 119684563 | over 3 years ago | I have reverted this change |
| 123128256 | over 3 years ago | When a new mapper appears from nowhere and starts to change tagging which local experienced mappers have agreed on for over a decade makes me think here we go again.
|
| 119880046 | over 3 years ago | > it seems odd that OSM don't have a
|
| 122596006 | over 3 years ago | Thank you |
| 122596006 | over 3 years ago | Shell Island is hardly an insignificant destination |
| 122596006 | over 3 years ago | Bore da
|
| 120521090 | over 3 years ago | Please keep your changes to sensible areas. This changeset covers a large area, several countries and should be broken into several smaller changes. |
| 118426681 | over 3 years ago | Hi
When tagging access on rights of way please ensure you do not break other usecases, this could well be motor_vehicle=private, but it is a right of way for foot/bikes and horses. Cheers Phil |
| 118874300 | over 3 years ago | Thank you however those sites are hardly authoritative and the names appear to have been made up with no on the ground knowledge. Hardly suitable for OSM which is supposed to reflect the real world. A junction name should as a minimum appear on a sign. Cheers Phil |
| 118874300 | over 3 years ago | What is the source of this ridiculous name, nobody calls it Whetstone as it is not in Whetstone. It has no verifiable name but is generally known as Leicester South of just Junction 21. |
| 119891252 | over 3 years ago | You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers. You don't need to add translated names where they don't differ from the main name tag, any computerised data consumer should be able to use the name tag if there is no language specific name. What source are you using for these edits? Cheers Phil |
| 119990551 | over 3 years ago | Thank you for your reply, however you have not answered my question as to where these edits were discussed with the UK community, I would expect a minimum of a post to the talk-gb mailing list. You do seem to be adding pointless duplicate name tags, which just adds clutter and makes it harder for unpaid mappers who look after their own local areas to spot the important tags, OSMs most valuable resource are these unpaid volunteers. You don't need to add translated names where they don't differ from the main name tag, any computerised data consumer should be able to use the name tag if there is no language specific name. What source are you using for these edits? Cheers Phil |
| 119678023 | over 3 years ago | I suspect the bug you should be reporting is that it is checking motorway bridges at all. If a motorway bridge is anything other than default then there has been an epic fail on behalf of the builders. |
| 120051550 | over 3 years ago | I am, it seems unlikely that such a small place has a non-local name, that is normally for big cities. |
| 120051550 | over 3 years ago | Hi, what is the source of this name. Cheers Phil |
| 119990551 | over 3 years ago | This relation is for the adin area City of Leicester, yet you have added a large number of duplicates which simply say Leicester. There is no point adding duplicate name tags. Please could you also use meaningful human readable changeset comments which describe what you have done so that the local community can read what you have done. A maaningless hastag totally fails at this. Were these edits discussed withe the UK community? |