trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 103046158 | almost 4 years ago | Ignore it?
|
| 117697841 | almost 4 years ago | Just wondering why you have removed the wikidata tag from Northwood? |
| 109995866 | almost 4 years ago | Please do not add cartpaths to public highways, leisure centres of carparks. OSM should only reflect what is in the real world. Rubbish removed. |
| 110943895 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, this is not a charity shop, why did you change it? Cheers Phil |
| 111077734 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, in this changeset you have mapped a path way/982094029 which is causing rather a lot of concern on @talk-gb. I am wondering what sources you used, have you walked it or were you using some other source? Cheers Phil |
| 117042323 | almost 4 years ago | Brownfield is for land that has previously been developed and the development is then cleared.
|
| 117017351 | almost 4 years ago | You used a source which is a breach of copyright, we absolutely must not copy from other maps |
| 117015934 | almost 4 years ago | We are not allowed to use the OS Mapping which is included in the planning application site. The copyright statement at the bottom of the map makes that very clear. We have no complete, opendata, source of addresses at this level in the UK. The only way to gather address data is to go out and survey, which takes time. Some of the addresses you have added are not publicly accessible, the sections of Lowe Hill Road are not residential but at best service roads/shared driveways, with private access. I have reverted this edit. |
| 117004466 | almost 4 years ago | Hi
OSM is a database which reflects verifiable real world information, a doestic garage with an operator and and an operator:type of quango is certainly questionable. |
| 116876709 | almost 4 years ago | Sorry, realised that you didn't change the noticeboard. |
| 116876709 | almost 4 years ago | 5. Advertising on the noticeboard by the library is prohibited, amenity=notice_board |
| 116876709 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, you have made several errors in this changeset.
Cheers Phil |
| 116579669 | almost 4 years ago | I have updated the POI with its current name / fhrs / website. |
| 115024652 | almost 4 years ago | Again I do not believe this is a foodbank. c/o in the address suggests this is an admin contact. locations,geojson does seem to be rather more sane than foodbanks.geojson and suggests that the foodbank is at the Salvation Army. But again is just a postcode centoid, not an actual location and is pointing at the wrong building. Cheers Phil |
| 114968311 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, I am fairly certain this is not the location of a foodbank or if this is actually 157. It appears to simply be a postcode centoid. Cheers Phil |
| 115159337 | almost 4 years ago | It appears that this location is the postcode centoid of the postcode given on the website, however the website is very clearly wrong giving totally the wrong postcode. I have moved the location of the POI to a more sensible location and have removed to erroneous |
| 115159337 | almost 4 years ago | Hi Brian
What source did you use as based on the address I would not have put it here. Cheers Phil |
| 116579669 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, what is the source of this edit? Was this a recent survey? The only reason I ask is that I have been meaning to update Carluccio's as it is now a different Italian restaurant. Cheers Phil |
| 105269597 | almost 4 years ago | Maybe spend an extra few seconds improving the usefulness of the map by adding the car park which is far more useful than parking aisles. Cheers Phil |
| 116354101 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you for you comment however the first and most important point is that we absolutely not allowed to use google maps when mapping in OSM. Using such data could put the entire project at risk. The houses are addressed as Shrewsbury Road, so other than a prohibited source is there any other evidence of this name? There are no visible signs and the name does not appear in any open data source that I am aware of. OS Opendata being the most likely. Cheers Phil |