https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278744020613521

Hi
A turn restriction here isn't quite correct as at this point Garstang Road is divided. It would be preferable to split Garstang Road at this point and allow the resulting oneway to take care of routing.

Cheers Phil

Thank you, you are correct. I will update those tags.

Hi
Welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edits, they are very useful. You can put the route code into a prow_ref tag and add designation=public_footpath.

One small problem, you do need to provide connectivity to the road, otherwise routers will see it as a dead end and not route over it.

Here to help if you have any questions on OSM and rights of way.

Cheers Phil

Hi John
When using iD to make changes to an object it is best to keep within the tags dropdown which allows you to update only those tags which have changed.

At top level iD is rather clunky.

I have restored the building, please could you check I have done it correctly?

Cheers Phil

Hi, why would a way drawn through a car park that is already tagged as access=customers be private?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits.

NPE is a very strange choice of imagery to be using in 2021, it is only one inch to a mile and better out of copyright sources are available such as the 1:25k OS maps which include the field boundaries which are vital for mapping rights of way.

In OSM we try to map the walked line, rather than the definitive line which tends for require a survey. The walked line is often different to the legal line.

If using a 50+ year old map are you sure the path exists on the ground and has it been diverted or extinguished?

If you have any questions please ask, either here or on the talk-gb mailing list.

Cheers Phil

Hi
There is a facebook tag for facebook pages, they should not be tagged as a website.
This pub also has a proper website however which should be tagged using the website tag and is obviously preferred over facebook.

Cheers Phil

Strangely enough I drove this road this morning, and the signs were definitely green indicating in UK terms it is part of the primary road network. Not a motorway, but certainly the best and most important road in the area.
The tagging we use in the UK does a very good job of classifying the network and certainly gives the expected results. I am not sure what the end result of such changes would be, but this could have caused OSMand to send me north and over the A66 which would have been longer than necessary.

I am reverting this changeset.

Which is correct here?
Is the school building abandoned, i.e. derelict or is it just a building that is no longer a school.
The tags abandoned:building=school and building=yes contradict each other.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.

The level crossing nodes should be at the point where the road itersects with the railway. The road is however still tagged as construction so nothing will route over it. Your edit suggests that this is now open, is that the case?

Cheers Phil

Hi, I am not sure that this edit makes much sense.
Whilst it is true that the European part of The Netherlands is within the timezone you have added, it is pretty unlikely that the parts of the relation that are in the Caribbean are on CET.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Just wondering why you have removed the amenity=pub from the Ty Coch.

It doesn't appear to be closed.

Cheers Phil

Thank you Freddy
This is another usecase of our data I had never considered. But it does make a lot of sense.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits.

However I am a little confused by this one, what source have you used as I have never seen a weight restriction sign for this bridge?

Cheers Phil

Thank you. it just looks very odd that a co-op would be built with new houses so close and not to provide a sustainable route between them.

No even on foot?

You have also deleted part of Mirabelle Road, is there really no connectivity?

Reverted as requested.

Sorry didn't see the later versions only the spam and verbal diarrhea.

Have fixed it