I was commenting on name='Public Convenience' which is a description.

I would probably go with highway=cycleway here. Highway=bridleway evokes a muddy track in a rural setting.

The important tag will be designation=public_bridleway however don't forget to add horse=designated.

Cheers Phil

Except my mistake is that the denomination should be mormon.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edit however according the wiki denomination= jehovahs_witness is the correct tag. It seems a bit wrong to include the name in the denomination tag.

Cheers Phil

Why have you made this series of changes? Has it been discussed anywhere?

The language of OSM is English and the correct term in English is lift. Elevator is an Americanism.

Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for your edit however names should be only used for the actual name of an object and not for descriptions.
osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Cheers Phil

Hi Mundik
This road is certainly a legal right of way, it is not unknown for local residents to try to deter access (especially in COVID times) and it is my job to ensure they don't succeed,

Looking at the photo I would remove access=agricultural and add surface=unpaved tracktype=grade4, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes, motor_vehicle=private. I will leave the 4x4 brigade to worry beyond that.

The section between the A483 and Ty Stanley should be restored to highway=unclassified.

This combination should be sufficient to ensure that deliveries to Ty Stanley are made from the A483 and motor vehicles are not routed over the track.

Cheers Phil

Thank you however the picture you have now shared is just for roadworks and possible delays. It says nothing about a road closure.

Mapping roadworks such as this in the OSM database is not a bad idea. Often they fail to be removed, as as happened in this case and therefore has been directing everyone the long way for over 6 months.

Apps tend to update map data periodically, monthly at best although many are far less frequent and this sort of edit should be avoided.

The OSM database is really not the place for such data.

Cheers Phil

Access=agricultural really has no legal meaning in the UK. If a track is only accessible to the landowner then it should be tagged as access=private however that is not the case for this track as it is legally a public road. You can legally drive any vehicle here, walk, ride a bike or horse.

I see that you have used OS OpenData Street and from that you would have seen that this road has a solid casing meaning it is public highway and therefore should not be restricted. Access=yes is appropriate.

In order to prevent unsuitable vehicles being routed this way it needs a tracktype tag, did the driver give any indication or take any photos?

Cheers Phil

I would imagine the road closure the document is referring to is hereabouts in Cardiff.

way/13412838#map=17/51.52815/-3.13412

Hi, when mapping please ensure that you merge your mapping with existing mapping. In this changeset you have duplicated a way and given the impression that the right of way is a separate way, which it is clearly not.

way/173303585 should have been, realigned and extended, with a split where the footpath leaves and the gap in the hedge for a stile/gate can be seen.

The existing mapping is slightly offset but that is to be expected of mapping from 8 years ago but it is important that these objects are improved for the benefit of all map users.

Cheers Phil

Sorry, just realised you didn't create the routable link. It was added by one of your colleagues.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Please consider the access and routing implications when mapping service road links between public highways.

The ways you have added here are clearly through a farmyard and therefore need to be tagged as access=private.

Cheers Phil

Hi, the source you have used seems very odd. Why would Cardiff City Council have a road closure here?

What other evidence is there to suggest this road is closed for construction?

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edit however we do not have permission to copy from or use google maps.

Also when adding names to objects please use proper capitalisation, lower case looks very poor quality.

Cheers Phil

Please be careful when mapping speedlimits.

You are still making serious errors, particularly with 20 mph zones, again you have mapped roads which are 20 mph as 30 mph.

I have fixed your errors.

Cheers Phil

The 60 mph limit does not extend to the roundabout. There is a 40 mph zone which I have added.

I see that you colleague has added the 50 mph section, although I have fixed his 30 mph section at Penley, it is 20 mph. Your driver must have been mistaken if he thought the limit was 60.
Sorry but going from knowing there are limit changes in a section to finding an processing imagery takes time, and crossing the border has been forbidden for much of the last year. Mapillary still has not published.

I intended to update the limits, but had other life stuff to do but felt it was more import that incorrect high limits are not displayed on a drivers satnav. No limit will always to better than being told I can do 60 when the limit is 50.

Cheers Phil

I am intending to map the correct speed limits once I finish processing my video files.

However you have not answered my questions.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edit however you have added incorrect speedlimit data.

Where did you obtain the GPS traces you are using and what visual confirmation did you use?

Also what does ITS stand for?

Cheers Phil