Hi Colin
You are right. I did not intend to change these parishes, in fact I wasn't intending to touch any relations.

I will see if I can work out what I did and fix them when I get home.

Cheers Phil

Thank you
The name does seem redundant to me as that is on the overall bus station but routes start from a particular stop within the bus station so mapping them is useful to help passengers find the right stop.

Cheers Phil

Hi, just wondering why you have removed the bus_stop tags?

Many users and applications use them, not to mention OSM carto.

Please restore them.

Cheers Phil

No reply so have restored objects.

Reverted

Reverted

Reverted

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Please do not duplicate existing features, I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Hi Hemat, the school is already mapped on the surrounding campus. Adding a node is a duplication, also the school is not called Canterbury.
I have reverted this changeset.

Cheers Phil

Hi Hemat
Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit.

The houses you have added are already mapped meaning that you have created duplicates. I have reverted this edit.

For a beginner it is far easier to learn using iD for the osm site, josm is quite advanced.

Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi, please keep your changesets to sensible areas, in this case you have created a bounding box covering a large are which makes it difficult for mappers to spot changes which affect their areas.
Also oneway=no is unnecessary, it should only be used in places like town centres where most roads are oneway.

Cheers Phil

I have updated this to service, with tracktype=2 appropriate access tags for rights of way to the south and access to farms from the North.

Cheers Phil

I am the original mapper of way/188050722 and can confirm that it was mapped correctly in terms of vehicle access.
The point where it changed from unclassified to track was surveyed and was the point I was able to drive to.
Beyond that it is a bridleway as far as far as the mapped bridleway. Just north of that point there is a gate. From there, intp S|tanton to the tertiary road is private for access to premises.
It could be argued that this is a highway=service with tracktype=grade2 with appropriate access tags.
North of BW access=private
South of BW motor_vehicle=private
horse/foot/bicycle=yes

Cheers Phil

Hi, thank you for adding these roads however it is import to consider existing mapping when adding new features.
In this case the area is crossed by a footpath, which based on it proximity to the road you have added should clearly be incorporated in the new residential road. As it stands now there is no connectivity.

Also as this is now a residential area please take just a few seconds of update the residential area to include this new estate.

Cheers Phil