The middle of a footpath is a bit of an odd place for a pedestrian crossing.
I have reverted this changeset

Hi, welcome to OSM.
In OSM we only add thing that are verifiable and what you have added are meaning less doodles.
I have reverted this changeset.

No response and based on later edits I have reverted this.

Hi, please do not delete schools and redraw as houses. I have reverted this changeset.

Hi, in openstreetmap we map what exists on the ground. This appears to be fiction, we do not add things that will be removed later.
Vandalism reverted

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add what exists in real life, please do not add test data.

The description 'to be planted' suggests that this is not yet a wood so plrobably shouldn't be mapped as one. The name NRN looks odd, the name field is for actual names and abbreviations are rarely names of woods.

Please only add what really, exists and please remember that OSM is a live database.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.
It always concerns me when a new mapper starts by deleting and 'improving' other experienced mappers work based purely on aerial imagery. I am assuming you are not local based on your US locale.
Please keep your changes small and try to add new stuff that is local to you.
You have changed the service ways in the car park into paths, which is odd as motor vehicles now cannot use them.
I am reverting this edit as it appear to have broken a well mapped feature.

Cheers Phil

No response so have reverted and redid the good bits.

Changeset was too big to pick through.

Hi, thank you for your edit however it has gone a little wrong and I have reverted it.

Shrewsbury School was already correctly mapped, it is not one big building.

Please continue to map but only add things that exist in real life.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. This is very big for a first edit. Please try to keep them smaller.

I am not sure what you mean by fix me requests, but if you means suggestions made by the iD editor, then they do need to be reviewed individually as the suggestions are often not the correct thing to do.

A few issues I have found.
The tags for English Bridge were already part of the relation, they should not be duplicated on the outer way.

M & S, H & M and Smiths are not individual buildings, the buildings forming Pride Hill were mapped correctly after much survey work.

Greenhous was mapped as an area, that was correct. It is not all a single building.

Drive-through=no is not needed on banks, do they even exist outside the US?

way/350314934 is part of Rea Brook, but the name should not be put onto the riverbank, the tagging was correct.

way/52280910 was still a construction site 3 weeks ago and as all building work has stopped then it probably still is.

Hazeldine Court is on the ground, it should not have level=1 on it.

What is the source of the screens at Cineworld?

Please take care mapping and check each tag that is being changed,

Please add new stuff, but keep you changes small.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edit however I am always a bit concerned when a new mapper begins by deleting a large number of existing objects.

Please continue to map, but try to add new objects and please look at and consider the warnings generated by the editor, such as crossing buildings.

Cheers Phil

HI, Black Lodge Brewing was already mapped. I have removed your duplication.

Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit. Just one small thing, the name tag in OSM is used for actual names, Former Royal Mail Sorting Office is a description of what it used to be. Until it becomes something else, the name tag in this case should be removed.
Otherwise a good edit.
A question on existing data, Elizabeth House is more likely 46m tall and not 46 feet?

Cheers Phil

And make them meaningful. Data Change is not helpful.

Hi, what source did you actually use for this edit?
way/789750526 seems rather unlikely as it creates a routable link. I am guessing there is a break at some point but no imagery shows that and really this needs a survey. Don't know when that will be.
As a minimal hack please tag this as as a driveway with access=private which is how such shared driveways are normally tagged.

Cheers Phil

Hi, what evidence do you have to change this to a track? Imagery and usage doesn't suggest that to me.

Cheers Phil

I would include the community name to be clear so prow_ref="Llanrug 75"

Cheers Phil

There is only one single on the ground object, Shropshire Council and Unitary authority are exactly the same thing.

Q21694759 is a duplication that appears to have been created by someone who lacked any short of on the ground knowledge.

Why have you changed this?

The orignal wikidata tag was accuarate and you seem to have replaced it with a duplicate.The admin area Shropshire is the Shropshire Council area.

Please revert this edit.

Cheers Phil

Hi
Please could you look at note/2150713.
The mapping of York Street does look a bit odd, I can seen no physical division, only paint) on any aerial imagery and the bit of tertiary link seems strange. Should there be some sort of access restriction?

Cheers Phil