OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
70915037 over 6 years ago

Please take into account existing data, edits such as this degrade the quality of OSM.
If you are adding parking aisles please spend a little more time to at least adjust the adjust the existing car park to match.
Cheers Phil

70895603 over 6 years ago

Again you (as in Amazon) are making exactly the same errors of assuming residential roads are missing that were correctly mapped.
You (as in Amazon) are ignoring comments previously made that if there is a public residential road here it would have been mapped.
See comments made in changeset/70388919
changeset/70232266
changeset/70383697
Here I can clearly see the cahnge in roadsurface and turning areas at the end of the previously mapped Leicester Way and again this is confirmed on OS Opendata.
Cheers Phil

70879452 over 6 years ago

Again look at the existing map, You have again crossed a footpath without creating a join and ignored the iD error.
Cheers Phil

70873972 over 6 years ago

Hi, this edit has gone very wrong.
Firstly this appears to be a private shared driveway, not a public residential road. A residential road in the middle of the countryside is highly unlikely, especially when it leads into an area with temporary buildings.
You have also failed to take any account of existing data. This way crosses a footpath which you have not joined, iD gives a clear warning but you have ignored it. You have also taken no account of a hedge and 3 fences that the way passes though.
Also creating a routable public link in this way is dangerous, assume it is private. A map user could very easily assume this is a shortcut to the footpath and be very disappointed.
Cheers Phil

70799935 over 6 years ago

Referring to way/693691365

70799935 over 6 years ago

Again, if there was a residential road here it would have been mapped a long time ago. Please stop and think when adding a single residential road. This again is a private driveway.
Cheers Phil

70712666 over 6 years ago

You can just click on the map and add bookmark. There is no need to add it to the map. Just click edit bookmark to give it a meaningful name.
HTH Phil

70712666 over 6 years ago

Hi, thank you for your response.
When you add to the map, that means the actual map i.e. Openstreetmap, which is then shared and can then confuse and mislead other map users. If you want to store private information then you should use the bookmark function.
HTH Phil

ps I will revert this edit.

70809011 over 6 years ago

Hi
You seem to have created a very large changeset that does little other than add bicycle=yes to the A49. Any other changes are hidden behind this mass of pointless tags. Bicycle=yes is not needed as if router doesn't want to route a bike down a UK trunk road arguably its a bug with that router and that should be fixed rather than tagging for the router in OSM.
Cheers Phil

70727624 over 6 years ago

Hi, just wondering why you have removed the Irish and Welsh wikipedia links leaving only English?
Whilst they were not in the correct format you simply threw that information away you did not even add a wikidata link.
Sometimes it is simpler to just add a wikidata tag in order to avoid the sensitive issue of choosing a language although I am favouring both Welsh and English when mapping in Wales.
Cheers Phil

70712666 over 6 years ago

Also Hoppers Bar, according to existing tags closed 5 years ago.
What sources are you using?

70725901 over 6 years ago

Are a really a place of worship?

70689965 over 6 years ago

Hi, this edit has gone wrong. The wikidata tag you added refers to the stone circle not the civil parish.
The wikidata for the civil parish is Q1234698.
Cheers Phil

70667683 over 6 years ago

Thank you, that looks like the right way.

Cheers Phil

70667683 over 6 years ago

You should be adding to the map, that causes it to be added to openstreetmap.
I am told you need to do a long press on the location and then tap the bookmark button in the bottom left corner.
HTH Phil

70667683 over 6 years ago

Maps.me has a bookmark function for storing points that you do not want to add to OSM.

70667683 over 6 years ago

Is this really a viewpoint?

What are you trying to map here?

Cheers Phil

70618850 over 6 years ago

Thank you for adding this, have seen it when driving passed but have so far not got around to stopping. Will make a point next time.
Cheers Phil

70663654 over 6 years ago

They are not viewponts either, they appear to be just points along a walk which we do not map in OSM.
For example node/6504106785 seems to be just a point where a footpath meets a road. Is there something here that I am missing?
There needs to be a physical feature to be mapped.
Cheers Phil

70627122 over 6 years ago

These are driveways