trigpoint's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 34962794 | about 10 years ago | I have removed the tags from the duplicate cinema created in this changeset, the tags had been added to a car park node and dragged inside the building distorting the parking aisles.
|
| 35943405 | about 10 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. I do wonder if your business is really in the middle of the road? I also wonder if these are premises that can be visited by a customer with signs so that a passer by can verify their location? |
| 35928450 | about 10 years ago | Hi, thank you for your edit. Are you sure B & M is a DIY shop? B & M is usually tagged as shop=variety_store. I assume the B & Q has closed and the building taken over by B & M, it is always helpful to fill in the changeset comment to explain what you have done. |
| 35876407 | about 10 years ago | The building is a very boring and square with a flat roof, it is certainly purpose built as a youth club but is certainly not civic. It is probably the least civic building in Wem. Dictionaries cannot be seen as a guide to how words should be used, language evolves and dictionaries only document how words were used at a point in time and are often outdated.
|
| 35913487 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 35881219 | about 10 years ago | No need to shout. OSM tags are lowercase, hence your additions should be natural=heath. Cheers Phil |
| 35876407 | about 10 years ago | Have replaced the building tag. I also removed the term juvenile as that is quite an offensive term when describing good kids. |
| 35876407 | about 10 years ago | That was a mistake, only intended to change civic to yes. It is not a council owned building.
|
| 35861638 | about 10 years ago | I can do it if that is easier? |
| 35729011 | about 10 years ago | Removed as there is no point to these relations.
|
| 35861638 | about 10 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM.
Cheers
|
| 35832457 | about 10 years ago | Hi
Thanks |
| 35759193 | about 10 years ago | If the cash machine is located outside, it should be mapped as a node on the outside of the building rather than inside.
|
| 35729011 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 35635112 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 35635031 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 35653117 | about 10 years ago | Hi
|
| 35665718 | about 10 years ago | I can revert it, thanks for getting back |
| 35665718 | about 10 years ago | Please can you explain this edit, does it really affect the northern line? |
| 35620640 | about 10 years ago | For reference to previous discussion on this issue see note/474399 I am really not convinced by this change, the property boundaries match bing pretty well, I would call that pretty verifiable. The distinction between wall and fence is minor, most of the houses in this area look to be Victorian terraces, so barrier=wall is the most likely. One thing you can guarantee is that there are barriers. We do no have lots in the UK. that is an American term. I do not get you comment re Cadestra, that if not relevant in the UK. The only way to collect address data is to walk/cycle and record what you see. My view is that this change should be reverted, There are probably overlapping barriers here, but that can be fixed and the buildings traced. A green mass is far less meaningful, and less likely to inspire a local mapper. than the previously mapped walls. |