Hi, welcome to OSM.
I am not sure this is correct. If the church is derelict it is unlikely to still be a place of worship. Maybe building=church and historic=ruins. The name tag should be an actual name rather than a description, if it doesn't have a name the tag should be omitted.

Cheers Phil

Hi, this is a bit confusing. Is it a Premier Inn as in the name, or Travelodge as in the operator tag?

Cheers Phil

Hi. I have just spotted these edits and realise that the name isn't your doing but it would be good if you could correct the name to "Bechan Brook" and add name:cy=" Nant Bechan".

Cheers Phil

I can add some local knowledge here, this is a track leading to a what looks like a derelict farm, it is not a bridleway although I do not know its legal status.
The road labelled Mountain Track, some name tag abuse, is certainly not a bridleway. It is a track and based on experience the access=no tag is incorrect. It is at least motor_vehicle=private. In this area people have traditionally roamed the mountains pretty freely.
There are clear problems here picked up by the QA tool, but just making the problem disappear without understanding it does not help and makes problems harder to find.

I have reverted this edit.

Hi, welcome to OSM. I am a bit confused by this edit. What does grass_paver mean and how come you have removed the name from the bank?
Cheers Phil

Hi, please can you explain why you believe the highway=residential tag is unnecessary here? It looks to me that a local mapper was expressing something that exists on the ground.

Doodle reverted

Hi, I think this edit is incorrect. What is the reason you have made this connection when there is a note note/1261647 which clearly says there are bollards at this point?
The global range of your edits suggest you are working on some sort of project?
Cheers Phil

Thank you

Hi, when did node/638969930 become a zebra. My memory says it is traffic light controlled, probably a pelican.

Cheers Phil

Welcome to OSM, thank you for your edit but this looks to be a very odd place for an ATM. If I wanted some cash I would be very disappointed if I had to cross a runway to get to it.
Were you intending to put is somewhere else?
Cheers Phil

Hi Bryan. You mentioned the website which suggests you have not been there, how were you able to locate it?

Cheers Phil

Hi, I think this has gone a little bit wrong. I don't think the building fills the whole area. It should probably be tagged as amenity=college.
In this area it should have a primary name in Welsh. Did you spot one?
Cheers Phil

Hi, some of these changes are a little incorrect. A British pub garden is not the same as a German Biergarten.

The wiki page amenity=biergarten?uselang=en
clearly says "To be clear, a biergarten is not the same as (what is known in the UK as) a "beer garden", i.e., an outside area associated with a pub. These are not biergartens in the Southern German sense and may be tagged as a beer_garden"

It is also odd that you have tagged these as buildings. I would suggest you tag the area as amenity=pub, and tag the beer garden as leisure=garden.

Cheers Phil

Hi, please could you explain this change? What source did you use, have you visiited the location?
Tagging the road as private is very odd as it provides connectivity for pedestrians to both a public right of way and a footway crossing the nearby junction.
You seem to be making edits all over the planet, which suggests you are not a local and other mappers making similar edits suggest you are being directed in some way. If you are working for, or on behalf of someone, you should state that fact in your user profile.
Cheers Phil

Hi, I'm a little confused. Why have you changed this cycleway to a footway?

Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit seems to have gone a little wrong.
The village of Llandough/Llandochau Fach is already mapped, if there is something that needs updating the existing object should be changed rather than adding a new one.
The existing object is node/298042164 and it uses the correct tagging,
We use name:en for English names and name:cy for Welsh, int_name is not the correct tag to use in this case. A histroic name is only used if the name have changed, the name in name:cy is hardly historic.
I am going to remove this node as it is a duplication but will add name:en to the existing node.
It is interesting to see the name:cy as it far closer matches the pronounciation that I grew up with and the English name is just really wrong and confusing.
Cheers Phil

Hi Pete, you seem to be adding speed limits over quite a wide area and am wondering what source you are using.
Also I notice that several people, myself included, have commented on your changesets but you have yet to respond.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for adding these footpaths but you have made a classic beginner error of using the name tag for things that are not names or signed on the ground. But we do have a tag for such things, Eccleshall 84 and such should be put into the prow_ref tag.
Cheers Phil