Hi johnnie
There was no need to remove these paths, I am in no doubt that they exist. They just needed to be connected to Thornton Lane and the sidewalk tag removing as they are not sidewalks.
But please do no check OS, we do not have permission to use such data, what you see is the best data we can have.
Cheers Phil

Vandalism reverted

Hi, please can you explain this change, as far as I know wikipedia tags are not case sensitive. Who decided they must start with a capital letter?

Hi, not sure how closely you were looking here, but the smaller roundabout is clearly a mini-roundabout.

Hi, I'm not sure the address and postcode belong on the ATM. They belong to the post office to which it is attached :)

No response, so reverted

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your additions, however you do need to connect them to the road for them to be useful. Also I do not think footway=sidewalk is really an accurate description of these cross-field rights of way.
The correct way to tag rights of way is highway=footway, designation=public_footpath.
Feel free to ask if you need any help/advice.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit however you have created a number of duplications. McDonalds and TNT were already mapped using ways, mapping with nodes are a bit of a step backwards.
Also the name tag is for an actual name, and should not be used for descriptions such as 'playground' and 'car wash'.
If you could have a go at fixing these it would be appreciated, ask if you need any help.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. I have been trying to work out what you were doing here and all I could find were two new ways which had no tags. I am going to revert this change.
Please carry on editing, but it is better to map things locally that you know well to start with.

Hi, welcome to OSM.
In OSM we map what exists on the ground, the tags you have added suggest that this is on the wrong continent. Please remove and, if it.really exists, add.in an appropriate place. But please remember that OSM is not a business directory.

A google search took me in a little deeper and that gave a strange area, http://statistics.data.gov.uk/doc/statistical-geography/E00147121 which I could not work out the logic behind although it was suggested that it is postcodes, that example cuts at least one postcode in half.
It does feel wrong to be adding reference tags that refer to a different source to the one used to map the boundary, this area was mapped using OS Opendata Boundaryline.

Hi, just wondering if ref:gss has any purpose in osm. There appear to be several within the town, why this one? and what purpose do they serve? The areas have no geographic meaning and appear to have been drawn by a 2 year old.
Cheers Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution however Rose Park appears to be someones back garden, please remember that we only map things that exist on the ground.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Priory Country Park is already mapped as a nature reserve. Adding a park over the top seems contradictory and doubles the name. Bing imagery seems to confirm it is not what we normally tag as a park.

Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, based on your description and aerial imagery this area is a recreation ground, rather than a park. I have changed it and added the playground.

Hi, welcome to osm. Something has gone a little wrong here, the building you have created is rather large and covers several streets. Would you like some help fixing it?

Hi Brian
Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your contribution, I agree that the hypens are not required, although you have made a small typo in the name.
Yout have used map.me to make the change, which is a bit Mickey Mouse when it comes to names. Your name has gone into name:en, which is a bit ironic.
If you could login to the OSM site and use the iD editor you will be able to correct the name tag and delete name:en.
Thanks Phil

Reverted and name added

Hi Tom
Thank you for your comments, that sounds like you have actually made these changes using your own knowledge, rather than just copied from another map. This is the kind of input we prefer, there is no need to justify what you know/have seen by quoting another source.
Thank you for your input.
Phil

Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM tagging is sometimes subtle, there is a difference between a park and a recreattion ground and all evidence suggests this is a recreation ground.
1. OS Opendata calls it a recreation ground.
2. Imagery shows a grassy area with pitches laid out, that definitely fits the wiki definition for a recreation ground.
Why is such a tiny tagging difference so important?